
Every Pixar movie is connected. I explain how, and possibly why.
In 2012, I watched aĀ video on Cracked.com that introduced the idea (at least to me) that all of the Pixar movies actually exist within the same universe. Since then, Iāve obsessed over this concept, working to complete what I call The Pixar Theory, a working narrative that ties all of the Pixar movies into one cohesive timeline with a main theme. Another, longer, title is “The Grand Unifying Theory of Pixar Movies.”
This theory covers every feature-length movie made by Pixar Animation Studios since 1995. They include:
- Toy Story
- A Bugās Life
- Toy Story 2
- Monsters Inc.
- Finding Nemo
- The Incredibles
- Cars
- Ratatouille
- Wall-E
- Up
- Toy Story 3
- Cars 2
- Brave
- Monsters University
- Inside Out (in Part 2)
- The Good Dinosaur (in Part 3)
- Finding Dory (in Part 4)
- Cars 3, Coco, Incredibles 2, and Toy Story 4 will be included in the upcoming book
The point of this theory is to have fun and exercise your imagination while simultaneously finding interesting connections between these fantastic movies.Ā The trick is not take any of itĀ too seriously. If you would like to experience a shorterĀ versionĀ of this theory, check out the visualized Pixar Theory Timeline.Ā
In fact, I highly suggest you watch this video I made with Screen Junkies/Fandom below. It more thoroughly lays out this theory and its most complex ideas. It’s also a far more “current” version of the theory compared to the rest of this post. Plus, it has more movies included! Enjoy.
The original PixarĀ Theory:
As of this writing in 2013, Brave is the first and last movie in the timeline. Obviously, this movie about a Scottish kingdom during the Dark Ages is the earliest time period covered by the Pixar films, but itās also the only Pixar movie that actually explains why animals in the Pixar universe behave like humans sometimes.

In Brave, Merida discovers that there is āmagicā that can solve her problems but inadvertently turns her mother into a bear. We find out that this magic comes from an odd witch seemingly connected to the mysterious will-of-the-wisps. Not only do we see animals behaving like humans, but we also see brooms (inanimate objects) behaving like people in the witchās shop.
We also learn that this witch inexplicably disappears every time she passes through doors, leading us to believe that she may not even exist. Donāt get ahead of me, but weāll come back to Brave. Letās just say that for now, the witch is someone we know from a different movie in the timeline.

[Some of you have pointed out that the animals in Brave gradually regress back into an animal state, disproving the idea that this is the source of animals acting like humans. My rebuttal is simple. They regress because the magic wears off. Over time, their evolving intelligence grows naturally.]
Centuries later, the animals from Brave that have been experimented on by the witch have interbred, creating a large-scale population of animals slowly gaining personification and intelligence on their own.
There are two progressions: the progression of the animals and the progression of artificial intelligence. The events of the following movies set up a power struggle between humans, animals, and machines.
The stage for all-out war in regards to animals is set by Ratatouille, Finding Nemo, and Up, in that order. Notice I left out A Bugās Life, but Iāll explain why later.
In Ratatouille, we see animals experimenting with their growing personification in small, controlled experiments.

Remy wants to cook, which is something only humans explicitly do. He crafts a relationship with a small group of humans and finds success. Meanwhile, the villain of Ratatouille, Chef Skinner, disappears. What happened to him? What did he do with his newfound knowledge that animals were capable of transcending their instincts and performing duties better than humans?
Itās possible that Charles Muntz, the antagonist of Up, learned of this startling rumor, giving him the idea to begin inventing devices that would harness the thoughts of animals, namely his dogs, through translator collars. Those collars indicated to Muntz that animals are smarter and more like humans than we think. He needed this technology to find the exotic bird heās obsessed over, and he even comments on how many dogs heās lost since he arrived in South America.

But then Dug and the rest of his experiments are set free after Muntzās demise, and we donāt know the full implications of that, but what we do know is that animosity between the animals and humans is growing steadily. Now that humans have discovered the potential of animals, they are beginning to cross the line. To develop this new technology, the humans begin an industrial revolution hinted at in Up.
[Some have pointed out that Muntz was working in South America before the events of Ratatouille. This is true, but it is not explicitly stated how and when he developed the collars. Also, we know Ratatouille takes place before Up for several reasons. In Toy Story 3, a postcard on Andy’s wall has Carl and Ellie’s name and address on it (including their last names to confirm). This confirms that in 2010, the time of Toy Story 3, Ellie is still alive or hasn’t been dead long. This supports the idea that Up takes place years later.]

In the beginning of Up, Carl is forced to give up his house to a corporation because they are expanding the city.
Wait a second. What corporation is guilty for polluting the earth and wiping out life in the distant future because of technologicalĀ overreach?

Buy-n-Large (BNL), a corporation that runs just about everything by the time we get to Wall-E. In theāHistory of BNLā commercial from the movie, weāre told that BNL has even taken over the world governments. Did you catch that this one corporation achieved global dominance? Interestingly, this is the same organization alluded to in Toy Story 3:

In Finding Nemo, we have an entire population of sea creatures uniting to save a fish that was captured by humans. BNL shows up again in this universe via another news article that talks about a beautiful underwater world.
Lines are being crossed. Humans are beginning to antagonize the increasingly networked and intelligent animals.
Think about Dory from Finding Nemo for a second. She stands apart from most of the other fish. Why? She isnāt as intelligent. Her short-term memory loss is likely a result of her not being as advanced as the other sea creatures, which is a reasonable explanation for how rapidly these creatures are evolving.

Itās likely that the sequel to Finding Nemo, which is about Dory, will touch on this and further explain why. We may also get some more evidence pointing to animosity between humans and animals.
[Some great users have pointed out that Dory is actually more intelligent and shows signs of growth due to her ability to read and communicate with whales. This would actually show signs of how the animals are beginning to change in intelligence gradually.]
And that is the furthest movie in the āanimalā side of things. When it comes to A.I., we start with The Incredibles. Who is the main villain of this movie? You probably thought of Buddy, a.ka. Syndrome, who basically commits genocide on super-powered humans.

Or does he? Buddy didnāt have any powers. He used technology to enact revenge on Mr. Incredible for not taking him seriously. Seems a little odd that the man went so far as to commit genocide.
[A lot of people have been arguing about where The Incredibles actually takes place because we see technology from modern times and the 1980s even though everything has a 1960s vibe. This is cleared by Brad Bird, the director, who says the movie takes place in an alternate 1960s, which means the movie opens in the 1950s.]
And how does he kill all of the supers? He creates the omnidroid, an A.I. ākillbotā that learns the moves of every super-human and adapts. When Mr. Incredible is first told about this machine, Mirage mentions that it is an advanced artificial intelligence that has gone rogue.
Mr. Incredible points out that it got smart enough to wonder why it had to take orders. Ā The omnidroid eventually turns on Syndrome, and starts attacking humans in the city. Why would an A.I. want to just attack randomly? Do machines have an inherent hatred of humans?
The movie even shows clips of the superheroes with capes being done in by inanimate objects, such as plane turbinesā¦accidentally.


But why would machines want to get rid of humans in the first place? We know that animals donāt like humans because they are polluting the Earth and experimenting on them, but why would the machines have an issue?
Enter Toy Story. Here we see humans using and discarding āobjectsā that are clearly sentient. Yes, the toys love it Uncle Tom style, but over the course of the Toy Story sequels, we see toys becoming fed up. But wait, toys and inanimate objects arenāt necessarily machines, so how do they have some kind of intelligence?
Syndrome points to the answer. He tells Mr. Incredible that his lasers are powered by Zero Point Energy. This is the electromagnetic energy that exists in a vacuum. Itās the unseen energy we find in wavelengths and a reasonable explanation for how toys and objects in the Pixar world draw power.

By the events of the Toy Story movies, we are in the 90s until 2010. Itās been 40-50 years or so since the events of The Incredibles, giving A.I. plenty of time to develop BNL.
Meanwhile, Pixar is hinting at dissatisfaction among pockets of toy civilizations. The toys rise up against Sid in the first movie. Jesse resents her owner, Emily, for abandoning her. Lotso Hugginā Bear straight up hates humans by the third movie.
Toys are obviously not satisfied with the status quo, providing a reason for why machines and objects alike are ready to take over.
So, by the 2000s, the super-humans are all but gone, and mankind is vulnerable. Animals, who want to rise up Planet of the Apes style, have the ability to take over, but we donāt see this happen.
Also, A.I. never takes over humans by force. Why do you think that is? Itās reasonable to assume that machines did take over, just not as we expected. The machines used BNL, a faceless corporation (which are basically faceless in nature) to dominate the world, starting in the 1960s after the Omnidroid fails to defeat the Incredibles.
In each of the Toy Story movies, itās made painfully clear that sentient objects rely on humans for everything. For fulfillment and even energy. Itās hinted at that the Toys lose all life when put away in āstorageā unless they are in a museum that will get them seen by humans.

So machines decide to control humans by using a corporation that suits their every need, leading to an industrial revolution that eventually leads toā¦pollution. When the animals rise up against the humans to stop them from polluting the earth, who will save them? The machines.
We know that the machines will win the war, too, because after this war, there are almost no animals left on Earth. Whoās left?

Because the machines tip everything out of balance, Earth becomes an unfit planet for humans and animals, so the remaining humans are put on Axiom (or Noahās Ark if you want to carry on the Biblical theme where Wall-E is basically Robot Jesus and his love interest is aptly named Eve) as a last-ditch effort to save the human race.

On Axiom, the humans have no purpose aside from having their needs met by the machines. The machines have made humans dependent on them for everything because that is how they were treated as ātoys.ā Itās all they know.

Meanwhile on Earth, machines are left behind to populate the world and run things, explaining human landmarks and traditions still being prominent in Cars. There are no animals or humans in this version of Earth because theyāre all gone, but we do know that the planet still has many human influences left.
[Some have noted that the world ofĀ Cars can’t be after humans left because there’s no pollution shown in the movies. If you look carefully atĀ Wall-E, however, the world is never shown during this time, so we don’t really know how badly the Earth was polluted.]
[It’s possible that the machines sent humans away to curb overpopulation and fix the environment without them, but the world was drained of resources as a result of machines populating the Earth. That would explain why the machines abandoned Earth entirely, leaving only Wall-E behind.]
In Cars 2, the cars go to Europe and Japan, making it plain that this is all taking place on Earth as we know it. So what happened to the cars? Weāve learned by now that humans are the source of energy for the machines. Thatās why they never got rid of them.
In Wall-E, they point out that BNL intended to bring the humans back once the planet was clean again, but they failed. The machines on Earth eventually died out, though we donāt know how.

What we do know is that there is an energy crisis in Cars 2, with oil being the only way society trudges on despite its dangers. We even learn that the Allinol corporation was using āgreen energyā as a catalyst for a fuel war in order to turn cars away from alternative energy sources. That ācleanā fuel could have been used to wipe out many of the cars, very quickly.

[Someone pointed out that “all in all” means the same thing as “by and large” making the connection between Cars and Wall-E even more substantial.]
Which brings us back to Wall-E. Have you ever wondered why Wall-E was the only machine left? We know that the movie begins 800 years after humans have left Earth on Axiom, governed by the AutoPilot (another A.I. reference).
Could it be that Wall-Eās fascination with human culture and friendship with a cockroach is what allowed him to keep finding fulfillment and the ability to maintain his personality? Thatās why he was special and liberated the humans.
He remembered the times when humans and machines lived in peace, away from all of the pollution caused by both sides.

After Wall-E liberates the humans and they rebuild society back on Earth, what happens then? During the end credits of Wall-E, we see the shoe that contains the last of plant life. It grows into a mighty tree. A tree that strikingly resembles the central tree in A Bugās Life.



Thatās right. The reason no humans show up in A Bugās Life is because there arenāt a lot left. We know because of the cockroach that some of the insects survived, meaning they would have rebounded a bit faster, though the movie had to be far enough in the timeline for birds to have returned as well, though they’re noticeably less intelligent than the bugs.
[I’ll admit, the trees looking similar isn’t enough to support the idea that A Bug’s Life takes place after Wall-E, but there’s definitely more reasons for why it’s likely. Also, I’ll bring the tree up again later because it appears in Up as well.]
Thereās something strikingly different about A Bugās Life when compared to other Pixar portrayals of animals, which leads me to believe it takes place in the future. Unlike Ratatouille, Up, and Finding Nemo, the bugs have many human activities similar to what the rats in Ratatouille were merely experimenting with.
The bugs have cities, bars, advertisements, their own machines, know what a bloody mary is and even have a traveling circus. This all assumes that the movie is in a different time period.
The other factor that sets A Bugās Life apart from other Pixar movies is the fact that it is the only one, besides Cars and Cars 2, that doesnāt revolve (or even include) humans.

[Okay there is a a lot of contention over the idea that A Bug’s Life takes place post-apocalypse, but hear me out. The reason I am so inclined to push the idea is because of how different the bug world is from the “animal” movies. No other Pixar movie has animals wearing clothing, wild inventions, animals creating machines, or so much human influence like bars and cities.]
[In Finding Nemo, the most human thing we see is a school, and even that is pretty stripped down. But in A Bug’s Life, we have a world where humans are barely even implied. At one point, one of the ants tells Flik not to leave the island because there are “snakes, birds, and bigger bugs out there.” He doesn’t even bring up humans.
[Yes, there are some humans, like the kid who allegedly picked the wings off of the homeless bug, but that still fits in a post Wall-E world. Also, the bugs have to be irradiated for them to live such long lifespans. The average lifespan of an ant is just 3 months, but these ants all survive an entire summer and allude to being around for quite some time by saying things like “this happens every year.” One of the ants even says he “feels 90 again.” That works if you accept that the ants are sturdier due to evolution and mutated genes.]
Thereās another Pixar movie that was supposed to be released in 2012, but it was cancelled and replaced with Brave. This movie was called Newt, and I believe it might have fit in this part of the timeline post-Wall-E. The movieās supposed plot: āWhat happens when the last remaining male and female blue-footed newts on the planet are forced together by science to save the species, and they canāt stand each other?āĀ

A movie about an endangered species rebuilding itself could lend itself nicely to this theory, but since the movie was never released, Iām just speculating.
So what happens next? Humanity, machines, and animals grow in harmony to the point where a new super species is born. Monsters. The monsters civilization is actually Earth in the incredibly distant future.
[Someone wisely pointed out that in Monsters University, the college is said to be founded in 1313. If we’re really in the future, then that means the monsters could have reset society and begun using their own calendar. That could mean Monsters Inc. takes place up to 1400 (or more) years after A Bug’s Life.]
Where did they come from? Itās possible that the monsters are simply the personified animals mutated after the diseased earth was irradiated for 800 years.
[Not during Wall-E. I would guess that it took hundreds of years after Wall-E for the animals to become monsters]

Whatever the reason, these monsters seem to all look like horribly mutated animals, only larger and civilized. They have cities and even colleges, as we see in Monsters University.
[An issue some have found is that this doesn’t properly explain what happened to humans. I haven’t settled on a theory I really like yet, but I’m leaning towards the idea that monsters and machines eventually forgot that they need humans and got rid of them again, not realizing their mistake until all humans died out. Another explanation is that humans just couldn’t survive on Earth anymore.]
In Monsters Inc., they have an energy crisis because they are in a future earth without humans. Humans are the source of energy, but thanks to the machines, again, the Monsters find a way to use doors to travel to the human world. Only, itās not different dimensions.

The monsters are going back in time. Theyāre harvesting energy to keep from becoming extinct by going back to when humans were most prominent. The peak of civilization, if you will. Though a lot of time has passed, animosity towards humans never really went away for animals/monsters.
Monsters must have relied on anti-human instincts to believe that just touching a human would corrupt their world like it did in the past. So they scare humans to gather their energy until they realize that laughter (green energy) is more efficient because it is positive in nature.
[An alternative explanation that fits even better that some of you brought up: The machines and monsters created the time travel doors but realized that messing with time could erase their existence and change history. So, they falsely trained monsters to believe that humans are toxic and from another dimension, making it suicide for a monster to interact too much with their world.]
[Another issue is how the monsters seem to worry about kids “being less scared these days.” It’s likely that going in the past takes a lot of energy, so the monsters can only go back as far as the practice still returns a profit in energy. To them, they’re just moving through the same dimension of time, but the monsters at the top know that eventually, they’ll run out. This is why Waternose is so bent on capturing children and enslaving them.]
We even see a connection between A Bugās Life and Monsters Inc. via the trailer we see in both movies. As you can see, the trailer looks exactly the same, except the one in A Bugās Life is noticeably older and more decrepit, while the one in Monsters Inc.Ā (where Randall is sent via a door) has humans and looks newer.

Look at the picture above. On the left is the trailer from A Bugās Life and the one on the right is from Monsters Inc. The one on the left looks older and more rundown. Even the vegetation is noticeably dryer and thereās less of it. The trailer on the right has humans and the frame even includes tall grass and a tree hanging overhead.
[Some have argued that the trailer in A Bug’s Life should be nothing but dust. I disagree based on how barely intact other buildings were in Wall-E. They also bring up the bug zapper that is powered by electricity. The zapper could easily be solar powered, just like Wall-E. The bugs probably used it as a light source to signal other bugs to “Bug City.” Also, the trailer in A Bug’s Life never shows lights in the trailer like it does for Monsters Inc.]
That said, Monsters Inc. is so far the most futuristic Pixar movie. By the end, humans, animals, and machines have finally found a way to understand each other and live harmoniously.
And then thereās Boo. What do you think happened to her? She saw everything take place in future earth where ākittyā was able to talk. She became obsessed with finding out what happened to her friend Sully and why animals in her time werenāt quite as smart as the ones sheād seen in the future.
She remembers that ādoorsā are the key to how she found Sully in the first place and becomesā¦

A WITCH. Yes, Boo is the witch from Brave. She figures out how to travel in time to find Sully, and goes back to what she believes is the source: The will-of-the-wisps.
They are what started everything, and as a witch, she cultivates this magic in an attempt to find Sully by creating doors going backwards and forwards in time.
[Just to clarify: The theory is that Boo discovered a way to use doors to travel through time on her own, possibly by developing magic on her own. She probably went back in time to the Dark Ages to get more magic from the will-o-wisps.]
How do we know? In Brave, you can briefly see a drawing in the workshop. Itās Sully.

We even see the Pizza Planet truck carved as a wooden toy in her shop, which makes no sense unless sheās seen one beforeā¦(and Iām sure she has since that truck is in almost every Pixar movie). If you look closely, you can see the carved truck below.
You remember Merida opening doors and the witch constantly disappearing? Itās because those doors are made the same way from Monsters Inc. They transport across time and that is why Merida couldnāt find the witch later in the movie.
[A lot of people have brought up how easter eggs are scattered throughout all the Pixar movies. I barely scratch the surface, but a great theory offered by some that I support is that these easter eggs are planted by Boo either intentionally or accidentally as she travels through time to find Sully. Some support for that is the fact that every easter egg in Brave lies in her workshop.]
But wait. How did Boo travel in time in the first place, and why is she obsessed with wood? Boo must have discovered that wood has been the source of energy all along, not just humans. The machines and monsters in Monsters Inc. use doors because theyāre made of wood and found a way to use that energy to travel in time.
[Many have pointed out how the door that banishes monsters is metal. That’s probably because wood is used to harness this magic, and using a metal door would stop a banished monster from going back through it.]
Obsessed with finding Sully, Boo travelled across the Pixar universe using doors.
[It’s even possible that the wood from the tree in A Bug’s Life is the source of Flik’s ingenuity, due to his fascination and respect for seeds growing into trees. The tree also bears a resemblance to the one in Up that Carl and Ellie frequented, which could be the source of Carl’s wild creativity in using balloons to transport his house.]
[This also explains why Flik and Heimlich from A Bug’s Life show up in Toy Story 2, which would be centuries before their time. Boo was trying to go to the future and could have fallen short by landing in the post-Wall-E time. She would need wood to keep time traveling, but there’s not much around yet, so she stumbles upon the tree in A Bug’s Life. She could have accidentally brought back a few bugs with her when traveling backwards in time.]
So Boo went back to the Dark Ages, probably because she could use plenty of wood there for her experiments or to study the will-o-wisps. We know that her first encounter with Morādu ended with her turning him into a monstrous bear, but he regresses.
She probably wanted to turn him into a bear because Sully resembles a bear, and she is still trying to figure out where Sully comes from.
Does Boo ever find Sully? I like to think so. He surely reunited with her at least once as a child at the end of Monsters Inc., but eventually, he had to stop visiting.
But her love for Sully is, after all, the crux of the entire Pixar universe. The love of different people of different ages and even different species finding ways to live on Earth without destroying it because of a lust for energy.
And that is the Pixar Theory.
ForĀ Inside Out,Ā The Good Dinosaur, and Finding Dory,Ā the story continues in Parts 2,3, and 4 Ā respectively, so here are some other helpful links for your reading pleasure:
- The Pixar Theory – What aboutĀ Planes?
- The Pixar Detective – an expanded universe novel that explains the theory as a full narrative.
Thanks for reading this. Be sure to say hey on Twitter: @JonNegroni
All images courtesy of Disney/Pixar


Boo might not have necessarily discovered time travel on her own. At the end of monsters inc we see sully return to boo after mike repairs the door, boo may have grown up with regular visits from sully and may have even gone into the monsters world and studied the doors when she was older.
“Bug’s Life” is a remake of “Seven Samurai,” a 1954 Japanese period adventure drama film co-written, edited, and directed by Akira Kurosawa.
So there’s that.
So sadly I found some dates in Monsters, Inc. that lead me to believe the future theory is not accurate or if it is would have to be 2000 years in the future from Bug’s Life.
In the paperwork at minute marker 38:43 you clearly see Production Calendar: May 8, 2000
Earlier in the film you see scare dates of a child dated June 2, 1999.
So to me that says that the human world is on the same timeline as the monster world.
My best guess is that this Montropolis exists in some area of the world not populated by humans
Didn’t you read the whole theory? The monsters (hybrids) were so advanced that they were able to create time machines so they could use humans as their source of energy to refill their energy supply so they could exist (like a paradox), that’s why you can see “old” periods on these “scare dates”.
In the end, the message is that we can find everything we want on nature, without the need of relying on it so much to risk all the world’s life on it because of a stupid lust for “evolution”.
I thought that too – scare dates would be in the human timeline – production calendar to me means monster calendar – am I missing something? Unless Monsters, Inc. runs on the human calendar – the newspapers in the world have been too blurry to make out dates – but it would appear 2000 is on those too just can’t confirm yet
Well, the theory said that when monsters came into being, they reset the calendar, suggesting that their timeline started at 0. Because of this reset,monsters inc takes place far into the future, being human years + 0 to 2000 of monsters inc years (at least that’s how I interpreted it lol)
Picture yourself in an unknown world where there is nothing you’ve ever seen before, you’d search for informations or someone who could tell ya’ why you were there, maybe that’s what happened with the first monsters, and since they had discovered nothing, they just reproduced themselves and naturally evolved.
Maybe they are the result of irradiated human bodies after the humans came back to Earth after the “renewal”, perhaps some undetected disease appeared after their comeback, since they weren’t adapted enough to live again on the planet , probably some sort of remaining radiation could have affected them, and since they hadn’t a good immunoglobulin, they were affected by it.
Maybe A Bugs Life portrays the world on the “cleaning process”, and that’s why we can’t see so many humans there, because they are still checking the world before put their feet there again…
Who knows! This whole thing is just a theory, we can’t be 100% sure, but, in my opinion, Monsters inc. runs on their calendar, because they reseted it to 0, and that’s why we can’t see “year 4000 or year 5000” in the movie.
There is an Easter Egg in Toy Story 2 that implies A Bug’s Life takes place at the same time. As Buzz is walking though some grass, one of the blades has a caterpillar that greatly resembles Heimlich from A Bug’s Life. Unfortunately I do not remember where in the movie it can be found, but one should be able to find it by googling A Bug’s Life/Toy Story 2 Easter Egg.
This removes some credit from the time travel theory, however it could be a result of Boo accidentally bringing Heimlich with her. And another comment questions the scare dates on a calender, it they went back in time, they would need to know when so as not to do it again. Regardless, excellent work.
This was a blooper after the movie, therefore not necessarily part of the movie or timeline.
First of all, fan friggin’ tastic. I love this theory. Now for my two cents.
I dont really remember “A Bugs Life” overly well, but from the image you used, it looks like a lot of the urban construction was from trash. Which sounds plausible from my memory. Anyways, if this is the case it would further. Support the theory that the events happened shortly after Wall-e, since the landfill that earth had become couldn’t be remotely close to having been cleaned up yet. Plus, I would say, it’s safe to assume that the city’s of earth had larger deposits of trash. This is supported by the fact that cars showed rural landscapes that were clear and open. Once all the machines died out from over pollution from their own out put, killing the trees that provided the energy, the ecosystem did the crash we see in Wall-e.
My second bit of added theory goes with the new one, “The Good Dinosaur”. If this reality is to be taken into consideration as the reality in which the Pixar Universe began, then I would say that the possibility is strong that the alternate rate of evolution and the lack of fossil fuels would force the society to find other energy sources, a quest alluded to in your theory. Who is to say that the wisp-o-wills were not harvested as this energy source and that their usage isn’t what causes the sentience. This would also coincide with the idea of the wood being the true source, since the wisps are a natural fairy type thing and perhaps their fear of being used drove them to hide in the trees, which we began harvesting to create homes, toys, and so forth. Perhaps we even derived a form of liquid energy from them that started being used to run cars and machines.
Just more fuel for the theoretical conversation. You might also take into account Pixar’s vocal stance on what this theory reflects harmony of man, nature, and technology. It could fuel your desire to call this theory into plausibility.
what a load of absolute bollox, they are cartoons created for entertainment and to makes lots of money. You really need to spend ur time a lot wiser or ur life will have been an utter waste……
Honestly I don’t understand anything I read. What IS the theory?I am starting to believe everything is just over analyzed
than the obvious and thoughtful “props”
Please help me understand what this poison is trying to say
agreed. and what was the A.I. “killer bot”
From the incredible
The one he had to fight
This is a great theory. I believe that It could be either, but the only way to prove or disprove this theory is to look for signs in the next pixar movies. These movies (Newt, finding Dory, and the good dinosaur) could have plenty of clues to prove the theory. Just keep your minds open to new things and keep your eyes open for new clues
This theory is amazing by the way. And I think I can add a little to it. Think back to the end of the incredibles when they just saved the world from the A.I. robot. Do you remember the next villain? He was a mole. A mole man. Some kind of “hybrid” if you will. You said that the magic and energy ends with finding Nemo for a while, but the next movie in the timeline has the answer. This animal talked too. people could understand him, unlike in finding Nemo. Think forward to monster’s Inc. can boo hear what sully and the other monsters are saying? The answer is yes. Could this “Hybrid” be the very first monster? could monsters have survived the apocalypse in Wall-E by living under ground? Never mind the fact that moles can hibernate, which solves the energy problem. Could these mole people have survived by living underground, hibernating until earth was clean again? I’d like to think so. And how these moles look different than monsters? There was plenty of toxic waste on earth to mutate these mole people into different shapes and sizes until unrecognizable figures. Then after there internal energy ran out, they looked towards scream as a power source or energy source. Now I did stretch about 30 seconds of film, but maybe this is true. Please take into consideration this snip it of information to your amazing collection.
-Joash DeVz
I just thought of something. The mole people could have left the underground once they saw that the tree from Wall-E was planted, or felt the magic (because you said the wood could be magic) from it and came out to the surface world.
If someone has spent their time in a way they enjoy, its not a waste of time. I feel like you guys were redirected without knowing where the story sprung from, which was Pixar saying that all of the pixar movies take place in the same world.
Pixar has never said that
What if he did it in his free time smart-ass
I agree – this is pretty ridiculous just like the Paul is dead “clues” found on Beatle records. Now here is a true story – on work I went to a concert and ended up sittinng next to a production guy from Pixar and one of the two lines woven through each movie are 1: John Ratzenburger and 2: Pizza Planet. He told me that there is a reference to pizza planet in each film but that was back in 2010. D
If Monsters Inc did take place in the future, post-apocalypse, it is possible that whatever annihilated the humans and led to their disappearance from earth could have been some form of plague or disease, and the very last humans (possible children, if adults passed the disease amongst themselves in everyday interactions) carrying the vestiges of that could have come into contact with some already evolving animals and perhaps even caused them to mutate, thus beginning the idea that humans are toxic. Those animals could have become the monsters as we see in the Monsters Inc franchise. The doors that go back in time are safe because they would have been pre-apocalypse and thus free of disease. A slightly darker way to look at the demise of humans, but a possible way to explain the fear of children and humans in Monsters Inc.
At least this “conspiracy” theory is harmless.
maybe boo being visited by sully and possibly her visiting him caused he to be able to time travel. if she had time traveled through the doors and was the only human ever to do so that explains why she might be the only one to gain the powers. sounds like a long shot but i just dont think (even in this dimension) that time travel can just be learned its something that grows in side her as she visits sully and sully visits her.
humans died of an illness thats why the monsters are afraid to make contact with them they dont want to be wiped out by the same illness
And this actually kind of snapped something in place for me… remember in Monsters University when they have those shiny orbs that they use for the race, said to mimic what would happen if they touched a human toy? It kind of makes them swell up where the monsters were touched, like edema, or swollen lymph nodes.
Those “shiny orbs” were toxic glow urchins. They claimed that it would be like a kids toxic toys, back when monsters still thought kids were toxic
Here’s what I don’t understand…the witch uses the magic to turn humans into animals which is what starts this whole theory, right? So how could Boo be the witch when this whole theory was already in full swing before she was born in Monsters Inc?
That’s what I’m trying to understand! It sounds wonderful n’ all, but this little detail throws everything off, I think. Everyone seems to be caught up in how awesome this sounds that this little detail is being ignored. Anyone care to clarify?
time travel, did you read the rest of the theory?
there has also been speculation that Boo is also the little girl from Toy Story 3…. just throwing that out there š ( and yes I understand they have different hair colors but children’s hair can change just like their eyes can change colors)
Boo is in Toy story 3, she wears a headband and is shown at Sunnyside. She is not the little girl that was given all the toys. Also, I believe Boo’s real name is Mary.
Reblogged this on The Badlands and Everything After and commented:
Really cool, wild and smart theory about the interconnected world crafted by Pixar. Is it all about a girl’s love of a monster?
yep
dude, you have WAAAAYYYY too much time on your hands.
I don’t know if someone said this already, but In A Bugs Life bloopers, they show that the bird was a robot. This may help in the theory a tiny bit more.
Boo appears in the daycare in Toy Story 3. Any connection there?
The time of Toy Story 3 could be her natural time, and she is just growing up.
I was going to point out how Meet the Robinsons fits really well right before Cars, but then I remembered that Meet the Robinsons isn’t a Pixar movie.
Dinoco from Toy Story is also the name of the top racing company from Cars that Lightning McQueen wants to join. Not sure how strong a connection that is, but interesting nonetheless.
If you find John Lasseter’s email, SEND THIS TO HIM!
Watching Finding Nemo’s credits you’ll see Wazowski http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivcSKLnl-lY
I just want to know how the witch could be Boo if the whole theory comes in motion when the witch uses magic to get the ball rolling. Boo wasn’t born yet, and she couldn’t have traveled back in time to become the witch since the Monsters of Monsters Inc exist BECAUSE of the witch! It simply CANNOT be Boo! I don’t see it!
Time travelling is a tricky subject to deal with. Remember Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban? Harry didn’t know he saved himself from the Dementors, he fully believed that his father had saved him, and he would have died if he didn’t step in. it’s possible that the Will-of-the-Wisps release minute amounts of magic naturally, thus beginning this timeline. Boo could be related to (a) super(s) and that’s where she gets the ability to time travel, along with being exposed to the Will-of-the-Wisps. Who knows? But it makes sense that the witch is Boo because of the carvings of the Pizza Planet truck and Sulley that appear in her workshop.
@Eric exactly! that’s what i mentioned in a comment earlier. it throws a huge monkey wrench in this whole theory. @joshua yes, and it doesn’t make sense in harry potter either, but i let rowling get away with it, b/c she created the world. as far as this pixar theory goes, it’s just some blogger getting carried away with the easter eggs used in these films
I really enjoyed reading your theory and I found it very interesting! But in your theory you mention cars taking place after toy story 3, but if that was true why would this boy be wearing a lightning mcQueen shirt? It won’t let me insert a picture but there is one.
remember how in Cars, they watched movies? Maybe they made a
Cars movie in the Toy Story world? hahaha
After I read this theory, I thought of some other animated movies that I wasn’t sure whether they were Pixar or not and Googled them. Wreck it Ralph came to mind, however that is a Disney movie. So I found an article that was about how it seems like Wreck it Ralph should a Pixar movie and Brave should be the disney movie simply because Disney makes princess movies and Pixar does ” from the point of view of…” movies (the point of view of a fish, a car, a bug.). I realize that this could be completely irrelevant but maybe if some research were done it could open our eyes more to what may be going on in Pixar studios.
Here is the article’s URL: http://www.examiner.com/article/a-disney-conspiracy-is-wreck-it-ralph-really-a-pixar-movie-disguise
and turbo? the ew movie? i don“t know if it“s a pixar movie, but i guees it fix in this theory.
i“m sorry for my wrhiting.
Its dreamworks