The Pixar Theory

pixar theory

Every Pixar movie is connected. I explain how, and possibly why.

In 2012, I watched a video on Cracked.com that introduced the idea (at least to me) that all of the Pixar movies actually exist within the same universe. Since then, I’ve obsessed over this concept, working to complete what I call The Pixar Theory, a working narrative that ties all of the Pixar movies into one cohesive timeline with a main theme. Another, longer, title is “The Grand Unifying Theory of Pixar Movies.”

This theory covers every feature-length movie made by Pixar Animation Studios since 1995. They include:

  • Toy Story
  • A Bug’s Life
  • Toy Story 2
  • Monsters Inc.
  • Finding Nemo
  • The Incredibles
  • Cars
  • Ratatouille
  • Wall-E
  • Up
  • Toy Story 3
  • Cars 2
  • Brave
  • Monsters University
  • Inside Out (in Part 2)
  • The Good Dinosaur (in Part 3)
  • Finding Dory (in Part 4)
  • Cars 3, Coco, Incredibles 2, and Toy Story 4 will be included in the upcoming book

The point of this theory is to have fun and exercise your imagination while simultaneously finding interesting connections between these fantastic movies. The trick is not take any of it too seriously. If you would like to experience a shorter version of this theory, check out the visualized Pixar Theory Timeline. 

In fact, I highly suggest you watch this video I made with Screen Junkies/Fandom below. It more thoroughly lays out this theory and its most complex ideas. It’s also a far more “current” version of the theory compared to the rest of this post. Plus, it has more movies included! Enjoy.

The original Pixar Theory:

As of this writing in 2013, Brave is the first and last movie in the timeline. Obviously, this movie about a Scottish kingdom during the Dark Ages is the earliest time period covered by the Pixar films, but it’s also the only Pixar movie that actually explains why animals in the Pixar universe behave like humans sometimes.

Pixar Theory

In Brave, Merida discovers that there is “magic” that can solve her problems but inadvertently turns her mother into a bear. We find out that this magic comes from an odd witch seemingly connected to the mysterious will-of-the-wisps. Not only do we see animals behaving like humans, but we also see brooms (inanimate objects) behaving like people in the witch’s shop.

We also learn that this witch inexplicably disappears every time she passes through doors, leading us to believe that she may not even exist. Don’t get ahead of me, but we’ll come back to Brave. Let’s just say that for now, the witch is someone we know from a different movie in the timeline.

Pixar Theory

[Some of you have pointed out that the animals in Brave gradually regress back into an animal state, disproving the idea that this is the source of animals acting like humans. My rebuttal is simple. They regress because the magic wears off. Over time, their evolving intelligence grows naturally.]

Centuries later, the animals from Brave that have been experimented on by the witch have interbred, creating a large-scale population of animals slowly gaining personification and intelligence on their own.

There are two progressions: the progression of the animals and the progression of artificial intelligence. The events of the following movies set up a power struggle between humans, animals, and machines.

The stage for all-out war in regards to animals is set by Ratatouille, Finding Nemo, and Up, in that order. Notice I left out A Bug’s Life, but I’ll explain why later.

In Ratatouille, we see animals experimenting with their growing personification in small, controlled experiments.

Pixar Theory

Remy wants to cook, which is something only humans explicitly do. He crafts a relationship with a small group of humans and finds success. Meanwhile, the villain of Ratatouille, Chef Skinner, disappears. What happened to him? What did he do with his newfound knowledge that animals were capable of transcending their instincts and performing duties better than humans?

It’s possible that Charles Muntz, the antagonist of Up, learned of this startling rumor, giving him the idea to begin inventing devices that would harness the thoughts of animals, namely his dogs, through translator collars. Those collars indicated to Muntz that animals are smarter and more like humans than we think. He needed this technology to find the exotic bird he’s obsessed over, and he even comments on how many dogs he’s lost since he arrived in South America.

Pixar Theory

But then Dug and the rest of his experiments are set free after Muntz’s demise, and we don’t know the full implications of that, but what we do know is that animosity between the animals and humans is growing steadily. Now that humans have discovered the potential of animals, they are beginning to cross the line. To develop this new technology, the humans begin an industrial revolution hinted at in Up.

[Some have pointed out that Muntz was working in South America before the events of Ratatouille. This is true, but it is not explicitly stated how and when he developed the collars. Also, we know Ratatouille takes place before Up for several reasons. In Toy Story 3, a postcard on Andy’s wall has Carl and Ellie’s name and address on it (including their last names to confirm). This confirms that in 2010, the time of Toy Story 3, Ellie is still alive or hasn’t been dead long. This supports the idea that Up takes place years later.]

Pixar Theory

In the beginning of Up, Carl is forced to give up his house to a corporation because they are expanding the city.

Wait a second. What corporation is guilty for polluting the earth and wiping out life in the distant future because of technological overreach?

Pixar Theory

Buy-n-Large (BNL), a corporation that runs just about everything by the time we get to Wall-E. In the“History of BNL” commercial from the movie, we’re told that BNL has even taken over the world governments. Did you catch that this one corporation achieved global dominance? Interestingly, this is the same organization alluded to in Toy Story 3:

Pixar Theory

In Finding Nemo, we have an entire population of sea creatures uniting to save a fish that was captured by humans. BNL shows up again in this universe via another news article that talks about a beautiful underwater world.

Lines are being crossed. Humans are beginning to antagonize the increasingly networked and intelligent animals.

Think about Dory from Finding Nemo for a second. She stands apart from most of the other fish. Why? She isn’t as intelligent. Her short-term memory loss is likely a result of her not being as advanced as the other sea creatures, which is a reasonable explanation for how rapidly these creatures are evolving.

Pixar Theory

It’s likely that the sequel to Finding Nemo, which is about Dory, will touch on this and further explain why. We may also get some more evidence pointing to animosity between humans and animals.

[Some great users have pointed out that Dory is actually more intelligent and shows signs of growth due to her ability to read and communicate with whales. This would actually show signs of how the animals are beginning to change in intelligence gradually.]

And that is the furthest movie in the “animal” side of things. When it comes to A.I., we start with The Incredibles. Who is the main villain of this movie? You probably thought of Buddy, a.ka. Syndrome, who basically commits genocide on super-powered humans.

Pixar Theory

Or does he? Buddy didn’t have any powers. He used technology to enact revenge on Mr. Incredible for not taking him seriously. Seems a little odd that the man went so far as to commit genocide.

[A lot of people have been arguing about where The Incredibles actually takes place because we see technology from modern times and the 1980s even though everything has a 1960s vibe. This is cleared by Brad Bird, the director, who says the movie takes place in an alternate 1960s, which means the movie opens in the 1950s.]

And how does he kill all of the supers? He creates the omnidroid, an A.I. “killbot” that learns the moves of every super-human and adapts. When Mr. Incredible is first told about this machine, Mirage mentions that it is an advanced artificial intelligence that has gone rogue.

Mr. Incredible points out that it got smart enough to wonder why it had to take orders.  The omnidroid eventually turns on Syndrome, and starts attacking humans in the city. Why would an A.I. want to just attack randomly? Do machines have an inherent hatred of humans?

The movie even shows clips of the superheroes with capes being done in by inanimate objects, such as plane turbines…accidentally.

Pixar Theory

Pixar Theory

But why would machines want to get rid of humans in the first place? We know that animals don’t like humans because they are polluting the Earth and experimenting on them, but why would the machines have an issue?

Enter Toy Story. Here we see humans using and discarding “objects” that are clearly sentient. Yes, the toys love it Uncle Tom style, but over the course of the Toy Story sequels, we see toys becoming fed up. But wait, toys and inanimate objects aren’t necessarily machines, so how do they have some kind of intelligence?

Syndrome points to the answer. He tells Mr. Incredible that his lasers are powered by Zero Point Energy. This is the electromagnetic energy that exists in a vacuum. It’s the unseen energy we find in wavelengths and a reasonable explanation for how toys and objects in the Pixar world draw power.

Pixar Theory

By the events of the Toy Story movies, we are in the 90s until 2010. It’s been 40-50 years or so since the events of The Incredibles, giving A.I. plenty of time to develop BNL.

Meanwhile, Pixar is hinting at dissatisfaction among pockets of toy civilizations. The toys rise up against Sid in the first movie. Jesse resents her owner, Emily, for abandoning her. Lotso Huggin’ Bear straight up hates humans by the third movie.

Toys are obviously not satisfied with the status quo, providing a reason for why machines and objects alike are ready to take over.

So, by the 2000s, the super-humans are all but gone, and mankind is vulnerable. Animals, who want to rise up Planet of the Apes style, have the ability to take over, but we don’t see this happen.

Also, A.I. never takes over humans by force. Why do you think that is? It’s reasonable to assume that machines did take over, just not as we expected. The machines used BNL, a faceless corporation (which are basically faceless in nature) to dominate the world, starting in the 1960s after the Omnidroid fails to defeat the Incredibles.

In each of the Toy Story movies, it’s made painfully clear that sentient objects rely on humans for everything. For fulfillment and even energy. It’s hinted at that the Toys lose all life when put away in “storage” unless they are in a museum that will get them seen by humans.

Pixar Theory

So machines decide to control humans by using a corporation that suits their every need, leading to an industrial revolution that eventually leads to…pollution. When the animals rise up against the humans to stop them from polluting the earth, who will save them? The machines.

We know that the machines will win the war, too, because after this war, there are almost no animals left on Earth. Who’s left?

Pixar Theory

Because the machines tip everything out of balance, Earth becomes an unfit planet for humans and animals, so the remaining humans are put on Axiom (or Noah’s Ark if you want to carry on the Biblical theme where Wall-E is basically Robot Jesus and his love interest is aptly named Eve) as a last-ditch effort to save the human race.

Pixar Theory

On Axiom, the humans have no purpose aside from having their needs met by the machines. The machines have made humans dependent on them for everything because that is how they were treated as “toys.” It’s all they know.

Pixar Theory

Meanwhile on Earth, machines are left behind to populate the world and run things, explaining human landmarks and traditions still being prominent in Cars. There are no animals or humans in this version of Earth because they’re all gone, but we do know that the planet still has many human influences left.

[Some have noted that the world of Cars can’t be after humans left because there’s no pollution shown in the movies. If you look carefully at Wall-E, however, the world is never shown during this time, so we don’t really know how badly the Earth was polluted.]

[It’s possible that the machines sent humans away to curb overpopulation and fix the environment without them, but the world was drained of resources as a result of machines populating the Earth. That would explain why the machines abandoned Earth entirely, leaving only Wall-E behind.]

In Cars 2, the cars go to Europe and Japan, making it plain that this is all taking place on Earth as we know it. So what happened to the cars? We’ve learned by now that humans are the source of energy for the machines. That’s why they never got rid of them.

In Wall-E, they point out that BNL intended to bring the humans back once the planet was clean again, but they failed. The machines on Earth eventually died out, though we don’t know how.

Pixar Theory

What we do know is that there is an energy crisis in Cars 2, with oil being the only way society trudges on despite its dangers. We even learn that the Allinol corporation was using “green energy” as a catalyst for a fuel war in order to turn cars away from alternative energy sources. That “clean” fuel could have been used to wipe out many of the cars, very quickly.

Pixar Theory

[Someone pointed out that “all in all” means the same thing as “by and large” making the connection between Cars and Wall-E even more substantial.]

Which brings us back to Wall-E. Have you ever wondered why Wall-E was the only machine left? We know that the movie begins 800 years after humans have left Earth on Axiom, governed by the AutoPilot (another A.I. reference).

Could it be that Wall-E’s fascination with human culture and friendship with a cockroach is what allowed him to keep finding fulfillment and the ability to maintain his personality? That’s why he was special and liberated the humans.

He remembered the times when humans and machines lived in peace, away from all of the pollution caused by both sides.

Pixar Theory

After Wall-E liberates the humans and they rebuild society back on Earth, what happens then? During the end credits of Wall-E, we see the shoe that contains the last of plant life. It grows into a mighty tree. A tree that strikingly resembles the central tree in A Bug’s Life.

Pixar Theory

Pixar Theory

Pixar Theory

That’s right. The reason no humans show up in A Bug’s Life is because there aren’t a lot left. We know because of the cockroach that some of the insects survived, meaning they would have rebounded a bit faster, though the movie had to be far enough in the timeline for birds to have returned as well, though they’re noticeably less intelligent than the bugs.

[I’ll admit, the trees looking similar isn’t enough to support the idea that A Bug’s Life takes place after Wall-E, but there’s definitely more reasons for why it’s likely. Also, I’ll bring the tree up again later because it appears in Up as well.]

There’s something strikingly different about A Bug’s Life when compared to other Pixar portrayals of animals, which leads me to believe it takes place in the future. Unlike Ratatouille, Up, and Finding Nemo, the bugs have many human activities similar to what the rats in Ratatouille were merely experimenting with.

The bugs have cities, bars, advertisements, their own machines, know what a bloody mary is and even have a traveling circus. This all assumes that the movie is in a different time period.

The other factor that sets A Bug’s Life apart from other Pixar movies is the fact that it is the only one, besides Cars and Cars 2, that doesn’t revolve (or even include) humans.

Pixar Theory

[Okay there is a a lot of contention over the idea that A Bug’s Life takes place post-apocalypse, but hear me out. The reason I am so inclined to push the idea is because of how different the bug world is from the “animal” movies. No other Pixar movie has animals wearing clothing, wild inventions, animals creating machines, or so much human influence like bars and cities.]

[In Finding Nemo, the most human thing we see is a school, and even that is pretty stripped down. But in A Bug’s Life, we have a world where humans are barely even implied. At one point, one of the ants tells Flik not to leave the island because there are “snakes, birds, and bigger bugs out there.” He doesn’t even bring up humans.

[Yes, there are some humans, like the kid who allegedly picked the wings off of the homeless bug, but that still fits in a post Wall-E world. Also, the bugs have to be irradiated for them to live such long lifespans. The average lifespan of an ant is just 3 months, but these ants all survive an entire summer and allude to being around for quite some time by saying things like “this happens every year.” One of the ants even says he “feels 90 again.” That works if you accept that the ants are sturdier due to evolution and mutated genes.]

There’s another Pixar movie that was supposed to be released in 2012, but it was cancelled and replaced with Brave. This movie was called Newt, and I believe it might have fit in this part of the timeline post-Wall-E. The movie’s supposed plot: “What happens when the last remaining male and female blue-footed newts on the planet are forced together by science to save the species, and they can’t stand each other?” 

Pixar Theory

A movie about an endangered species rebuilding itself could lend itself nicely to this theory, but since the movie was never released, I’m just speculating.

So what happens next? Humanity, machines, and animals grow in harmony to the point where a new super species is born. Monsters. The monsters civilization is actually Earth in the incredibly distant future.

[Someone wisely pointed out that in Monsters University, the college is said to be founded in 1313. If we’re really in the future, then that means the monsters could have reset society and begun using their own calendar. That could mean Monsters Inc. takes place up to 1400 (or more) years after A Bug’s Life.]

Where did they come from? It’s possible that the monsters are simply the personified animals mutated after the diseased earth was irradiated for 800 years.

[Not during Wall-E. I would guess that it took hundreds of years after Wall-E for the animals to become monsters]

Pixar Theory

Whatever the reason, these monsters seem to all look like horribly mutated animals, only larger and civilized. They have cities and even colleges, as we see in Monsters University.

[An issue some have found is that this doesn’t properly explain what happened to humans. I haven’t settled on a theory I really like yet, but I’m leaning towards the idea that monsters and machines eventually forgot that they need humans and got rid of them again, not realizing their mistake until all humans died out. Another explanation is that humans just couldn’t survive on Earth anymore.]

In Monsters Inc., they have an energy crisis because they are in a future earth without humans. Humans are the source of energy, but thanks to the machines, again, the Monsters find a way to use doors to travel to the human world. Only, it’s not different dimensions.

Pixar Theory

The monsters are going back in time. They’re harvesting energy to keep from becoming extinct by going back to when humans were most prominent. The peak of civilization, if you will. Though a lot of time has passed, animosity towards humans never really went away for animals/monsters.

Monsters must have relied on anti-human instincts to believe that just touching a human would corrupt their world like it did in the past. So they scare humans to gather their energy until they realize that laughter (green energy) is more efficient because it is positive in nature.

[An alternative explanation that fits even better that some of you brought up: The machines and monsters created the time travel doors but realized that messing with time could erase their existence and change history. So, they falsely trained monsters to believe that humans are toxic and from another dimension, making it suicide for a monster to interact too much with their world.]

[Another issue is how the monsters seem to worry about kids “being less scared these days.” It’s likely that going in the past takes a lot of energy, so the monsters can only go back as far as the practice still returns a profit in energy. To them, they’re just moving through the same dimension of time, but the monsters at the top know that eventually, they’ll run out. This is why Waternose is so bent on capturing children and enslaving them.]

We even see a connection between A Bug’s Life and Monsters Inc. via the trailer we see in both movies. As you can see, the trailer looks exactly the same, except the one in A Bug’s Life is noticeably older and more decrepit, while the one in Monsters Inc. (where Randall is sent via a door) has humans and looks newer.

Pixar Theory

Look at the picture above. On the left is the trailer from A Bug’s Life and the one on the right is from Monsters Inc. The one on the left looks older and more rundown. Even the vegetation is noticeably dryer and there’s less of it. The trailer on the right has humans and the frame even includes tall grass and a tree hanging overhead.

[Some have argued that the trailer in A Bug’s Life should be nothing but dust. I disagree based on how barely intact other buildings were in Wall-E. They also bring up the bug zapper that is powered by electricity. The zapper could easily be solar powered, just like Wall-E. The bugs probably used it as a light source to signal other bugs to “Bug City.” Also, the trailer in A Bug’s Life never shows lights in the trailer like it does for Monsters Inc.]

That said, Monsters Inc. is so far the most futuristic Pixar movie. By the end, humans, animals, and machines have finally found a way to understand each other and live harmoniously.

And then there’s Boo. What do you think happened to her? She saw everything take place in future earth where “kitty” was able to talk. She became obsessed with finding out what happened to her friend Sully and why animals in her time weren’t quite as smart as the ones she’d seen in the future.

She remembers that “doors” are the key to how she found Sully in the first place and becomes…

Pixar Theory

A WITCH. Yes, Boo is the witch from Brave. She figures out how to travel in time to find Sully, and goes back to what she believes is the source: The will-of-the-wisps.

They are what started everything, and as a witch, she cultivates this magic in an attempt to find Sully by creating doors going backwards and forwards in time.

[Just to clarify: The theory is that Boo discovered a way to use doors to travel through time on her own, possibly by developing magic on her own. She probably went back in time to the Dark Ages to get more magic from the will-o-wisps.]

How do we know? In Brave, you can briefly see a drawing in the workshop. It’s Sully.

Pixar Theory

We even see the Pizza Planet truck carved as a wooden toy in her shop, which makes no sense unless she’s seen one before…(and I’m sure she has since that truck is in almost every Pixar movie). If you look closely, you can see the carved truck below.

Pixar Theory

You remember Merida opening doors and the witch constantly disappearing? It’s because those doors are made the same way from Monsters Inc. They transport across time and that is why Merida couldn’t find the witch later in the movie.

[A lot of people have brought up how easter eggs are scattered throughout all the Pixar movies. I barely scratch the surface, but a great theory offered by some that I support is that these easter eggs are planted by Boo either intentionally or accidentally as she travels through time to find Sully. Some support for that is the fact that every easter egg in Brave lies in her workshop.]

But wait. How did Boo travel in time in the first place, and why is she obsessed with wood? Boo must have discovered that wood has been the source of energy all along, not just humans. The machines and monsters in Monsters Inc. use doors because they’re made of wood and found a way to use that energy to travel in time.

[Many have pointed out how the door that banishes monsters is metal. That’s probably because wood is used to harness this magic, and using a metal door would stop a banished monster from going back through it.]

Obsessed with finding Sully, Boo travelled across the Pixar universe using doors.

[It’s even possible that the wood from the tree in A Bug’s Life is the source of Flik’s ingenuity, due to his fascination and respect for seeds growing into trees. The tree also bears a resemblance to the one in Up that Carl and Ellie frequented, which could be the source of Carl’s wild creativity in using balloons to transport his house.]

[This also explains why Flik and Heimlich from A Bug’s Life show up in Toy Story 2, which would be centuries before their time. Boo was trying to go to the future and could have fallen short by landing in the post-Wall-E time. She would need wood to keep time traveling, but there’s not much around yet, so she stumbles upon the tree in A Bug’s Life. She could have accidentally brought back a few bugs with her when traveling backwards in time.]

So Boo went back to the Dark Ages, probably because she could use plenty of wood there for her experiments or to study the will-o-wisps. We know that her first encounter with Mor’du ended with her turning him into a monstrous bear, but he regresses.

She probably wanted to turn him into a bear because Sully resembles a bear, and she is still trying to figure out where Sully comes from.

Does Boo ever find Sully? I like to think so. He surely reunited with her at least once as a child at the end of Monsters Inc., but eventually, he had to stop visiting.

But her love for Sully is, after all, the crux of the entire Pixar universe. The love of different people of different ages and even different species finding ways to live on Earth without destroying it because of a lust for energy.

And that is the Pixar Theory.

For Inside OutThe Good Dinosaur, and Finding Dory, the story continues in Parts 2,3, and 4  respectively, so here are some other helpful links for your reading pleasure:


Thanks for reading this. Be sure to say hey on Twitter: @JonNegroni

All images courtesy of Disney/Pixar

11,070 thoughts on “The Pixar Theory

  1. In “Your Friend The Rat”, Wall-E is seen driving a bus on Mars. Full of what? A short supply of humans, and vermin. The only things that were left when the BNL Cruise Ship landed on Earth. The only possible evidence of the fall of the clean-up robots is in the video game of Wall-E, where a tornado/hurricane wipes out the robots. So, one of Earth’s simple disasters obliterates BNL’s “clean-up” operation. So, the last survivors on Earth, plus Wall-E and some rats and fleas, went to Mars instead. That’s where the easter egg ties in.

  2. “Brave” might have replaced “Newt” ‘s time slot, but i’ll tell you which movie really replaced it: “Rio” … oh and then there’s always “Ice Age 2”.

  3. One problem I have with the theory is that the main antagonist of ratatouille, the chef, is substantially smaller than the antagonist in up. How would he go from being a little person to being a man with a normal stature? Not to mention, they lack resemblance, and the accent. To me, they aren’t the same guy, but even if they are, it doesn’t effect the theory. Their could of been some other guy who realized that animals were senteint. In my opinion, that connection should be left out, firstly, because its a contradiction, and it is also unessisary.

    • I think what this theory is trying to say is that Skinner tried to tell people that the rats are smarter than they think, people labeled him as crazy, and Muntz heard of this and decided to test the dogs with collars.

    • I think the author meant the antagonist from UP! heard rumors about the animal’s intelligence and then proceeded to develop new technology, not that they are the same person \

    • He didn’t say they were the same person…

    • He didn’t say they were the same person…

    • I think the idea was that the little chef informed Muntz…not that he is him…

    • I think that he’s implying that word got out from the critic, and the dude from Up found the rumor and looked into it extensivelly.

  4. Just a theory: In the end of the Incredibles movie, where Buddy tries to kidnap Jack-Jack, the baby turns into a monster to defend himself. Do you think this could be some sort of hint into the story? For example that maybe the remaining humans at the time society was being rebuilt in the post Wall-E era may have still owned superpowers that they were not aware of? I think this could have been the birth of the monsters to explain Monsters Inc.

    • That’s a good theory… Or even the remaining supers powers took on a strange mutation over the years. Or took strange mutation due to the radiation during the dying earth.

  5. Don’t forget about Frozen coming out at the end if this year.

    • frozen isn’t a pixar movie

  6. Dinoco isn’t from toy story it’s from cars

    • um, Dinoco is originally from Toy Story. That’s the gas station where Woody and Buzz found the Pizza Planet truck. Cars just touched on it more than Toy Story because it was a company that sponsored The King.

      • what was the witch’s name in brave? cuz boo’s real name is mary. and why would she move to scotland?

    • Actually there is a scene in toy story

  7. This sound pretty much like Matrix, the Grey Alien Conspiracy, Anunnaki theory all together, and the war between the three bodies of the human beign: flesh (animals), emotions (humans), mind (robots)… sounds like Pixar is trying to make us comfortable with some crazy ideas and truths that are going to surface in the near future; like human race been aid by aliens all along since the very beginning of our short history… investigate this theories and you shall see the conections! By the way… most excellent post!

  8. i have a question. In monsters inc. there is a part in the beginning when a blue monster is unable to scare a six year old. The head guy(the spider bad guy person) said that “kids these days” were hard to scare. Doesn’t that mean that this was happening in modern times and not in the past.

    • its just a saying. it would most likely still be around then, as its extreamly popular now

    • I think that the monsters could not continually go to the same child over and over, otherwise you would have two or more monsters trying to scare the same kid on the same night, so they would have to follow some sort of timeline of the humans in which the monsters did not overlap themselves. The monsters probably followed a progressive timeline and in turn had to also follow the same progression of time in the human world. ( I don’t know if this is correct, just a theory).

      • In the beginning of MU you see a picture of a monster drawn by a child. The monster in the picture resembles the one scaring the child. This proves that there is only one monster per child.

  9. This Pixar theroy struck my interest a few days ago when I saw a thread about it on TheChive. I have since familiarized myself with a few if the movies I had yet to see. And I think I’ve found a flaw. Not to insult, but if the monsters in the monsters inc. movie are traveling in time through the doors they enter, why is it that there is a scare energy crisis because “kids don’t scare as easily anymore”? Wouldn’t they just go to times in human history before children were desensitized to fearing monsters in the closet?? I would absolutely love it if you could e-mail me your rebuttal. Thank you. And yes, I am a real person.

    • I liked your argument. But just a thought. There could be a positive relationship between how far back the monsters can travel and how much energy they have to use. If this was the case, Since they are already in an energy crisis, they would have to conserve energy by not traveling back in time too far, ie: to a time when kids are already desensitized to fear to a certain extent. Just a thought

    • i think he made a speculation that the monsters were misinformed as to which causes the energy crisis

    • Well the monsters are brain washed and don’t know that they are traveling in time

  10. The Pizza Planet truck is all but destroyed in Wall-e, but is still intact and unrusted in a Bugs Life, which this article claims is farther in the future. Discuss.

    • It’s a whole company. Obviously they own multiple delivery trucks.

      • Yeah but weathering, corrosion and oxidization would happen to all of them to the extent of the one in wall-e, especially after 800 years of no maintenance

        • Maybe (this is just a theory, constructive criticism accepted) the Pizza Planet company started again a little time after Wall-E before ‘the ultimate apocalypse’ and created a few new trucks which survived into Bugs Life? Or am I over thinking this?

  11. The reason that monsters are scared of humans: the monsters can travel through time. Some of the things that we are scared of and make stories about were dropped off in time by monsters. They make up stories about the humans having superpowers. Maybe they traveled back to the time where humans had powers. The incredibles.

  12. crazy theory man! By the way1313 is Disney’s first address.

  13. Wow, that’s brilliant, have you noticed in the end of monsters inc. when sully enter in boo’s room, she gives him nemo and jessie to play with? Can you explain why? Sorry if i’ve written something wrong, I’m brasilian and I’m not that good with english

    • Yeah I noticed that, maybe Boo lived in our time when these movies had come out. But when Monsters Inc was released toy story 2 and finding nemo hasn’t been released. So these are also hints of new movies, but it also suggests that Boo lived a few yrs into the future of the time the movie was actually released. Perhaps a year or two years after finding nemo and toy story 2 was actually released

      • Jessie was probably a common toy but I don’t know about Nemo

  14. Really enjoyed it but have one problem. In Monsters Inc. they’re going through their energy crisis because human’s just aren’t as scared as they used to be. If they’re using time travel to go to the humans can’t they just go back to an earlier time where human’s are still scared of monsters? Or even visit the children on the same night in the past every workday because the child would have no memory of any monsters because to them it’s the first night they have been scared by it.

    • well if they went back to the time when kids were easily scared they’d run into monsters from the previous years that were trying to scare those kids. you can’t have multiple monster generations scarring one group of children.

    • This would create a time and space paradox since it would alter the reaction of the, before, first encouter with a monster and the “energy intake” of that past encouter in the present and future in the past. That is why they propably are having an energy crisis, they have a ” limited” number of encouters with a single kid.

  15. Has Pixar responded to this? Because, being a huge Disney/Pixar fan, I would love to here their response to this theory. It is quite incredibly thought out.

  16. I just wanted to point out that in a film from Disney and encorperated with Pixar . A man named John Clayton ( the antagonist ) fits the perfect scenario to be the antagonist from up, the time line would be almost exactly the same. John also comes to a jungle/ tropical area in search of animals. Which in fact ride up against a human who apprised a threat .

  17. GOOD QUESTION to your theory:

    Let’s take some relevant facts:
    – Wall-E:
    We se many “Wall-E Robots” on earth.
    We should suppose that they stopped because the sand storms, and our Wall-E survived because “he” learns how to avoid the storms, how to repair “himself” and be at stand by during the night, recharging batteries at the morning.
    Humans left the Earth at (rounded) 2100 and come back 2800 (it says “700 years birthday”).
    It is also very clear that the Wall-E robots were left on Earth to “dig it up”. And we see many garbage box building, leading us to believe that only our Wall-E was not able to make all the work alone (it shows one day of “his” work, altough 700 years, “he” could not do every along).

    – CARS:
    We see a great cars society, even cars bugs and small birds (seagulls), it is also very clear during the interview at CARS 2 that “oil comes from dead DINOSSAURS, and everyone knows what happened with them”.
    They may live a energy crisis, they don’t say any word about humans, but they know about othes animals (DINOSSAURS).

    Which leads me to the question:

    ## How is it possible that Human kind left Wall-E robots working on Earth at 2100 and the whole CARS Society could develop without humans, IF they were Wall-E Robots?

    # My point of view
    The only way I see is that the Wall-E robots could have been sent to Earth a bit later. But it doesn’t seem to agree with the mensage sent to Axiom about the dead of the life on Earth (ok here i should watch the flim again in English, not a translated version to Portuguese).. except… hummm… the CARS government spys knew about it and sent a fake mensage, because “nothing with photosynthesis were found” is a lie, we see many flowers and grass at CARS,

  18. One thing you missed is that “allinol” is likely a reference to ethanol blended fuels. They cause a chemical reaction with the metals used for the bodies of carburators in older vehicles and eventually do irreparable harm. This has become a problem for people who drive vehicles like those portrayed in the “Cars” movies as the corrosion eventually plugs up the passages and stops fuel from flowing. It’s also why you will see stickers warning against using these fuels in vehicles older than a certain year on gas station pumps. Having experienced this first hand in one of my cars, I can say that the damage is very noticeable when you disassemble a carburator that has been run on these fuels. It is not a problem on most newer cars with fuel injection since there is usually no zinc or magnesium in the fuel system.

  19. I think it’s interesting how Gilbert from the Incredibles describes a company “like an enormous clock. It only works if all the little cogs mesh together. A clock must be clean, well lubricated, and wound tight.”.
    Does this indicate the company is run by or for machines?

  20. Execellent theory, ruined my childhood and can’t watch a pixar film in the same way but made really good reading

  21. I see a lot of people talking about the “Kids these days are harder to scare” comment. Is it possible that they cannot obviously scare the same kid multiple times in a night. So as they progress in time, so must they time travel to a nearer time in the past. i.e. always travelling 100 years back directly or something. But if that’s true, then they would eventually run out of humans to scare as the timeline would eventually progress until human don’t exist. There’s the real energy crisis

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Jon Negroni

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading