The Pixar Theory

pixar theory

Every Pixar movie is connected. I explain how, and possibly why.

In 2012, I watched a video on Cracked.com that introduced the idea (at least to me) that all of the Pixar movies actually exist within the same universe. Since then, I’ve obsessed over this concept, working to complete what I call The Pixar Theory, a working narrative that ties all of the Pixar movies into one cohesive timeline with a main theme. Another, longer, title is “The Grand Unifying Theory of Pixar Movies.”

This theory covers every feature-length movie made by Pixar Animation Studios since 1995. They include:

  • Toy Story
  • A Bug’s Life
  • Toy Story 2
  • Monsters Inc.
  • Finding Nemo
  • The Incredibles
  • Cars
  • Ratatouille
  • Wall-E
  • Up
  • Toy Story 3
  • Cars 2
  • Brave
  • Monsters University
  • Inside Out (in Part 2)
  • The Good Dinosaur (in Part 3)
  • Finding Dory (in Part 4)
  • Cars 3, Coco, Incredibles 2, and Toy Story 4 will be included in the upcoming book

The point of this theory is to have fun and exercise your imagination while simultaneously finding interesting connections between these fantastic movies. The trick is not take any of it too seriously. If you would like to experience a shorter version of this theory, check out the visualized Pixar Theory Timeline. 

In fact, I highly suggest you watch this video I made with Screen Junkies/Fandom below. It more thoroughly lays out this theory and its most complex ideas. It’s also a far more “current” version of the theory compared to the rest of this post. Plus, it has more movies included! Enjoy.

The original Pixar Theory:

As of this writing in 2013, Brave is the first and last movie in the timeline. Obviously, this movie about a Scottish kingdom during the Dark Ages is the earliest time period covered by the Pixar films, but it’s also the only Pixar movie that actually explains why animals in the Pixar universe behave like humans sometimes.

Pixar Theory

In Brave, Merida discovers that there is “magic” that can solve her problems but inadvertently turns her mother into a bear. We find out that this magic comes from an odd witch seemingly connected to the mysterious will-of-the-wisps. Not only do we see animals behaving like humans, but we also see brooms (inanimate objects) behaving like people in the witch’s shop.

We also learn that this witch inexplicably disappears every time she passes through doors, leading us to believe that she may not even exist. Don’t get ahead of me, but we’ll come back to Brave. Let’s just say that for now, the witch is someone we know from a different movie in the timeline.

Pixar Theory

[Some of you have pointed out that the animals in Brave gradually regress back into an animal state, disproving the idea that this is the source of animals acting like humans. My rebuttal is simple. They regress because the magic wears off. Over time, their evolving intelligence grows naturally.]

Centuries later, the animals from Brave that have been experimented on by the witch have interbred, creating a large-scale population of animals slowly gaining personification and intelligence on their own.

There are two progressions: the progression of the animals and the progression of artificial intelligence. The events of the following movies set up a power struggle between humans, animals, and machines.

The stage for all-out war in regards to animals is set by Ratatouille, Finding Nemo, and Up, in that order. Notice I left out A Bug’s Life, but I’ll explain why later.

In Ratatouille, we see animals experimenting with their growing personification in small, controlled experiments.

Pixar Theory

Remy wants to cook, which is something only humans explicitly do. He crafts a relationship with a small group of humans and finds success. Meanwhile, the villain of Ratatouille, Chef Skinner, disappears. What happened to him? What did he do with his newfound knowledge that animals were capable of transcending their instincts and performing duties better than humans?

It’s possible that Charles Muntz, the antagonist of Up, learned of this startling rumor, giving him the idea to begin inventing devices that would harness the thoughts of animals, namely his dogs, through translator collars. Those collars indicated to Muntz that animals are smarter and more like humans than we think. He needed this technology to find the exotic bird he’s obsessed over, and he even comments on how many dogs he’s lost since he arrived in South America.

Pixar Theory

But then Dug and the rest of his experiments are set free after Muntz’s demise, and we don’t know the full implications of that, but what we do know is that animosity between the animals and humans is growing steadily. Now that humans have discovered the potential of animals, they are beginning to cross the line. To develop this new technology, the humans begin an industrial revolution hinted at in Up.

[Some have pointed out that Muntz was working in South America before the events of Ratatouille. This is true, but it is not explicitly stated how and when he developed the collars. Also, we know Ratatouille takes place before Up for several reasons. In Toy Story 3, a postcard on Andy’s wall has Carl and Ellie’s name and address on it (including their last names to confirm). This confirms that in 2010, the time of Toy Story 3, Ellie is still alive or hasn’t been dead long. This supports the idea that Up takes place years later.]

Pixar Theory

In the beginning of Up, Carl is forced to give up his house to a corporation because they are expanding the city.

Wait a second. What corporation is guilty for polluting the earth and wiping out life in the distant future because of technological overreach?

Pixar Theory

Buy-n-Large (BNL), a corporation that runs just about everything by the time we get to Wall-E. In the“History of BNL” commercial from the movie, we’re told that BNL has even taken over the world governments. Did you catch that this one corporation achieved global dominance? Interestingly, this is the same organization alluded to in Toy Story 3:

Pixar Theory

In Finding Nemo, we have an entire population of sea creatures uniting to save a fish that was captured by humans. BNL shows up again in this universe via another news article that talks about a beautiful underwater world.

Lines are being crossed. Humans are beginning to antagonize the increasingly networked and intelligent animals.

Think about Dory from Finding Nemo for a second. She stands apart from most of the other fish. Why? She isn’t as intelligent. Her short-term memory loss is likely a result of her not being as advanced as the other sea creatures, which is a reasonable explanation for how rapidly these creatures are evolving.

Pixar Theory

It’s likely that the sequel to Finding Nemo, which is about Dory, will touch on this and further explain why. We may also get some more evidence pointing to animosity between humans and animals.

[Some great users have pointed out that Dory is actually more intelligent and shows signs of growth due to her ability to read and communicate with whales. This would actually show signs of how the animals are beginning to change in intelligence gradually.]

And that is the furthest movie in the “animal” side of things. When it comes to A.I., we start with The Incredibles. Who is the main villain of this movie? You probably thought of Buddy, a.ka. Syndrome, who basically commits genocide on super-powered humans.

Pixar Theory

Or does he? Buddy didn’t have any powers. He used technology to enact revenge on Mr. Incredible for not taking him seriously. Seems a little odd that the man went so far as to commit genocide.

[A lot of people have been arguing about where The Incredibles actually takes place because we see technology from modern times and the 1980s even though everything has a 1960s vibe. This is cleared by Brad Bird, the director, who says the movie takes place in an alternate 1960s, which means the movie opens in the 1950s.]

And how does he kill all of the supers? He creates the omnidroid, an A.I. “killbot” that learns the moves of every super-human and adapts. When Mr. Incredible is first told about this machine, Mirage mentions that it is an advanced artificial intelligence that has gone rogue.

Mr. Incredible points out that it got smart enough to wonder why it had to take orders.  The omnidroid eventually turns on Syndrome, and starts attacking humans in the city. Why would an A.I. want to just attack randomly? Do machines have an inherent hatred of humans?

The movie even shows clips of the superheroes with capes being done in by inanimate objects, such as plane turbines…accidentally.

Pixar Theory

Pixar Theory

But why would machines want to get rid of humans in the first place? We know that animals don’t like humans because they are polluting the Earth and experimenting on them, but why would the machines have an issue?

Enter Toy Story. Here we see humans using and discarding “objects” that are clearly sentient. Yes, the toys love it Uncle Tom style, but over the course of the Toy Story sequels, we see toys becoming fed up. But wait, toys and inanimate objects aren’t necessarily machines, so how do they have some kind of intelligence?

Syndrome points to the answer. He tells Mr. Incredible that his lasers are powered by Zero Point Energy. This is the electromagnetic energy that exists in a vacuum. It’s the unseen energy we find in wavelengths and a reasonable explanation for how toys and objects in the Pixar world draw power.

Pixar Theory

By the events of the Toy Story movies, we are in the 90s until 2010. It’s been 40-50 years or so since the events of The Incredibles, giving A.I. plenty of time to develop BNL.

Meanwhile, Pixar is hinting at dissatisfaction among pockets of toy civilizations. The toys rise up against Sid in the first movie. Jesse resents her owner, Emily, for abandoning her. Lotso Huggin’ Bear straight up hates humans by the third movie.

Toys are obviously not satisfied with the status quo, providing a reason for why machines and objects alike are ready to take over.

So, by the 2000s, the super-humans are all but gone, and mankind is vulnerable. Animals, who want to rise up Planet of the Apes style, have the ability to take over, but we don’t see this happen.

Also, A.I. never takes over humans by force. Why do you think that is? It’s reasonable to assume that machines did take over, just not as we expected. The machines used BNL, a faceless corporation (which are basically faceless in nature) to dominate the world, starting in the 1960s after the Omnidroid fails to defeat the Incredibles.

In each of the Toy Story movies, it’s made painfully clear that sentient objects rely on humans for everything. For fulfillment and even energy. It’s hinted at that the Toys lose all life when put away in “storage” unless they are in a museum that will get them seen by humans.

Pixar Theory

So machines decide to control humans by using a corporation that suits their every need, leading to an industrial revolution that eventually leads to…pollution. When the animals rise up against the humans to stop them from polluting the earth, who will save them? The machines.

We know that the machines will win the war, too, because after this war, there are almost no animals left on Earth. Who’s left?

Pixar Theory

Because the machines tip everything out of balance, Earth becomes an unfit planet for humans and animals, so the remaining humans are put on Axiom (or Noah’s Ark if you want to carry on the Biblical theme where Wall-E is basically Robot Jesus and his love interest is aptly named Eve) as a last-ditch effort to save the human race.

Pixar Theory

On Axiom, the humans have no purpose aside from having their needs met by the machines. The machines have made humans dependent on them for everything because that is how they were treated as “toys.” It’s all they know.

Pixar Theory

Meanwhile on Earth, machines are left behind to populate the world and run things, explaining human landmarks and traditions still being prominent in Cars. There are no animals or humans in this version of Earth because they’re all gone, but we do know that the planet still has many human influences left.

[Some have noted that the world of Cars can’t be after humans left because there’s no pollution shown in the movies. If you look carefully at Wall-E, however, the world is never shown during this time, so we don’t really know how badly the Earth was polluted.]

[It’s possible that the machines sent humans away to curb overpopulation and fix the environment without them, but the world was drained of resources as a result of machines populating the Earth. That would explain why the machines abandoned Earth entirely, leaving only Wall-E behind.]

In Cars 2, the cars go to Europe and Japan, making it plain that this is all taking place on Earth as we know it. So what happened to the cars? We’ve learned by now that humans are the source of energy for the machines. That’s why they never got rid of them.

In Wall-E, they point out that BNL intended to bring the humans back once the planet was clean again, but they failed. The machines on Earth eventually died out, though we don’t know how.

Pixar Theory

What we do know is that there is an energy crisis in Cars 2, with oil being the only way society trudges on despite its dangers. We even learn that the Allinol corporation was using “green energy” as a catalyst for a fuel war in order to turn cars away from alternative energy sources. That “clean” fuel could have been used to wipe out many of the cars, very quickly.

Pixar Theory

[Someone pointed out that “all in all” means the same thing as “by and large” making the connection between Cars and Wall-E even more substantial.]

Which brings us back to Wall-E. Have you ever wondered why Wall-E was the only machine left? We know that the movie begins 800 years after humans have left Earth on Axiom, governed by the AutoPilot (another A.I. reference).

Could it be that Wall-E’s fascination with human culture and friendship with a cockroach is what allowed him to keep finding fulfillment and the ability to maintain his personality? That’s why he was special and liberated the humans.

He remembered the times when humans and machines lived in peace, away from all of the pollution caused by both sides.

Pixar Theory

After Wall-E liberates the humans and they rebuild society back on Earth, what happens then? During the end credits of Wall-E, we see the shoe that contains the last of plant life. It grows into a mighty tree. A tree that strikingly resembles the central tree in A Bug’s Life.

Pixar Theory

Pixar Theory

Pixar Theory

That’s right. The reason no humans show up in A Bug’s Life is because there aren’t a lot left. We know because of the cockroach that some of the insects survived, meaning they would have rebounded a bit faster, though the movie had to be far enough in the timeline for birds to have returned as well, though they’re noticeably less intelligent than the bugs.

[I’ll admit, the trees looking similar isn’t enough to support the idea that A Bug’s Life takes place after Wall-E, but there’s definitely more reasons for why it’s likely. Also, I’ll bring the tree up again later because it appears in Up as well.]

There’s something strikingly different about A Bug’s Life when compared to other Pixar portrayals of animals, which leads me to believe it takes place in the future. Unlike Ratatouille, Up, and Finding Nemo, the bugs have many human activities similar to what the rats in Ratatouille were merely experimenting with.

The bugs have cities, bars, advertisements, their own machines, know what a bloody mary is and even have a traveling circus. This all assumes that the movie is in a different time period.

The other factor that sets A Bug’s Life apart from other Pixar movies is the fact that it is the only one, besides Cars and Cars 2, that doesn’t revolve (or even include) humans.

Pixar Theory

[Okay there is a a lot of contention over the idea that A Bug’s Life takes place post-apocalypse, but hear me out. The reason I am so inclined to push the idea is because of how different the bug world is from the “animal” movies. No other Pixar movie has animals wearing clothing, wild inventions, animals creating machines, or so much human influence like bars and cities.]

[In Finding Nemo, the most human thing we see is a school, and even that is pretty stripped down. But in A Bug’s Life, we have a world where humans are barely even implied. At one point, one of the ants tells Flik not to leave the island because there are “snakes, birds, and bigger bugs out there.” He doesn’t even bring up humans.

[Yes, there are some humans, like the kid who allegedly picked the wings off of the homeless bug, but that still fits in a post Wall-E world. Also, the bugs have to be irradiated for them to live such long lifespans. The average lifespan of an ant is just 3 months, but these ants all survive an entire summer and allude to being around for quite some time by saying things like “this happens every year.” One of the ants even says he “feels 90 again.” That works if you accept that the ants are sturdier due to evolution and mutated genes.]

There’s another Pixar movie that was supposed to be released in 2012, but it was cancelled and replaced with Brave. This movie was called Newt, and I believe it might have fit in this part of the timeline post-Wall-E. The movie’s supposed plot: “What happens when the last remaining male and female blue-footed newts on the planet are forced together by science to save the species, and they can’t stand each other?” 

Pixar Theory

A movie about an endangered species rebuilding itself could lend itself nicely to this theory, but since the movie was never released, I’m just speculating.

So what happens next? Humanity, machines, and animals grow in harmony to the point where a new super species is born. Monsters. The monsters civilization is actually Earth in the incredibly distant future.

[Someone wisely pointed out that in Monsters University, the college is said to be founded in 1313. If we’re really in the future, then that means the monsters could have reset society and begun using their own calendar. That could mean Monsters Inc. takes place up to 1400 (or more) years after A Bug’s Life.]

Where did they come from? It’s possible that the monsters are simply the personified animals mutated after the diseased earth was irradiated for 800 years.

[Not during Wall-E. I would guess that it took hundreds of years after Wall-E for the animals to become monsters]

Pixar Theory

Whatever the reason, these monsters seem to all look like horribly mutated animals, only larger and civilized. They have cities and even colleges, as we see in Monsters University.

[An issue some have found is that this doesn’t properly explain what happened to humans. I haven’t settled on a theory I really like yet, but I’m leaning towards the idea that monsters and machines eventually forgot that they need humans and got rid of them again, not realizing their mistake until all humans died out. Another explanation is that humans just couldn’t survive on Earth anymore.]

In Monsters Inc., they have an energy crisis because they are in a future earth without humans. Humans are the source of energy, but thanks to the machines, again, the Monsters find a way to use doors to travel to the human world. Only, it’s not different dimensions.

Pixar Theory

The monsters are going back in time. They’re harvesting energy to keep from becoming extinct by going back to when humans were most prominent. The peak of civilization, if you will. Though a lot of time has passed, animosity towards humans never really went away for animals/monsters.

Monsters must have relied on anti-human instincts to believe that just touching a human would corrupt their world like it did in the past. So they scare humans to gather their energy until they realize that laughter (green energy) is more efficient because it is positive in nature.

[An alternative explanation that fits even better that some of you brought up: The machines and monsters created the time travel doors but realized that messing with time could erase their existence and change history. So, they falsely trained monsters to believe that humans are toxic and from another dimension, making it suicide for a monster to interact too much with their world.]

[Another issue is how the monsters seem to worry about kids “being less scared these days.” It’s likely that going in the past takes a lot of energy, so the monsters can only go back as far as the practice still returns a profit in energy. To them, they’re just moving through the same dimension of time, but the monsters at the top know that eventually, they’ll run out. This is why Waternose is so bent on capturing children and enslaving them.]

We even see a connection between A Bug’s Life and Monsters Inc. via the trailer we see in both movies. As you can see, the trailer looks exactly the same, except the one in A Bug’s Life is noticeably older and more decrepit, while the one in Monsters Inc. (where Randall is sent via a door) has humans and looks newer.

Pixar Theory

Look at the picture above. On the left is the trailer from A Bug’s Life and the one on the right is from Monsters Inc. The one on the left looks older and more rundown. Even the vegetation is noticeably dryer and there’s less of it. The trailer on the right has humans and the frame even includes tall grass and a tree hanging overhead.

[Some have argued that the trailer in A Bug’s Life should be nothing but dust. I disagree based on how barely intact other buildings were in Wall-E. They also bring up the bug zapper that is powered by electricity. The zapper could easily be solar powered, just like Wall-E. The bugs probably used it as a light source to signal other bugs to “Bug City.” Also, the trailer in A Bug’s Life never shows lights in the trailer like it does for Monsters Inc.]

That said, Monsters Inc. is so far the most futuristic Pixar movie. By the end, humans, animals, and machines have finally found a way to understand each other and live harmoniously.

And then there’s Boo. What do you think happened to her? She saw everything take place in future earth where “kitty” was able to talk. She became obsessed with finding out what happened to her friend Sully and why animals in her time weren’t quite as smart as the ones she’d seen in the future.

She remembers that “doors” are the key to how she found Sully in the first place and becomes…

Pixar Theory

A WITCH. Yes, Boo is the witch from Brave. She figures out how to travel in time to find Sully, and goes back to what she believes is the source: The will-of-the-wisps.

They are what started everything, and as a witch, she cultivates this magic in an attempt to find Sully by creating doors going backwards and forwards in time.

[Just to clarify: The theory is that Boo discovered a way to use doors to travel through time on her own, possibly by developing magic on her own. She probably went back in time to the Dark Ages to get more magic from the will-o-wisps.]

How do we know? In Brave, you can briefly see a drawing in the workshop. It’s Sully.

Pixar Theory

We even see the Pizza Planet truck carved as a wooden toy in her shop, which makes no sense unless she’s seen one before…(and I’m sure she has since that truck is in almost every Pixar movie). If you look closely, you can see the carved truck below.

Pixar Theory

You remember Merida opening doors and the witch constantly disappearing? It’s because those doors are made the same way from Monsters Inc. They transport across time and that is why Merida couldn’t find the witch later in the movie.

[A lot of people have brought up how easter eggs are scattered throughout all the Pixar movies. I barely scratch the surface, but a great theory offered by some that I support is that these easter eggs are planted by Boo either intentionally or accidentally as she travels through time to find Sully. Some support for that is the fact that every easter egg in Brave lies in her workshop.]

But wait. How did Boo travel in time in the first place, and why is she obsessed with wood? Boo must have discovered that wood has been the source of energy all along, not just humans. The machines and monsters in Monsters Inc. use doors because they’re made of wood and found a way to use that energy to travel in time.

[Many have pointed out how the door that banishes monsters is metal. That’s probably because wood is used to harness this magic, and using a metal door would stop a banished monster from going back through it.]

Obsessed with finding Sully, Boo travelled across the Pixar universe using doors.

[It’s even possible that the wood from the tree in A Bug’s Life is the source of Flik’s ingenuity, due to his fascination and respect for seeds growing into trees. The tree also bears a resemblance to the one in Up that Carl and Ellie frequented, which could be the source of Carl’s wild creativity in using balloons to transport his house.]

[This also explains why Flik and Heimlich from A Bug’s Life show up in Toy Story 2, which would be centuries before their time. Boo was trying to go to the future and could have fallen short by landing in the post-Wall-E time. She would need wood to keep time traveling, but there’s not much around yet, so she stumbles upon the tree in A Bug’s Life. She could have accidentally brought back a few bugs with her when traveling backwards in time.]

So Boo went back to the Dark Ages, probably because she could use plenty of wood there for her experiments or to study the will-o-wisps. We know that her first encounter with Mor’du ended with her turning him into a monstrous bear, but he regresses.

She probably wanted to turn him into a bear because Sully resembles a bear, and she is still trying to figure out where Sully comes from.

Does Boo ever find Sully? I like to think so. He surely reunited with her at least once as a child at the end of Monsters Inc., but eventually, he had to stop visiting.

But her love for Sully is, after all, the crux of the entire Pixar universe. The love of different people of different ages and even different species finding ways to live on Earth without destroying it because of a lust for energy.

And that is the Pixar Theory.

For Inside OutThe Good Dinosaur, and Finding Dory, the story continues in Parts 2,3, and 4  respectively, so here are some other helpful links for your reading pleasure:


Thanks for reading this. Be sure to say hey on Twitter: @JonNegroni

All images courtesy of Disney/Pixar

10,907 thoughts on “The Pixar Theory

  1. At the end of Cars you see them watching Toy Story and A Bugs Life, but in a car formation. Wouldn’t that also include how some (or all) of the Pixar movies are interlinked?

    • That’s right. And supposedly the Bugs Life story, comes after Cars story, that doesn’t fit with the timeline of the theory.

  2. I have read some of the earlier comments, and found one that integer me. it is the theory of taking animals on the axiom. like humans, they may have been pampered, and when they regimes yo earth, they may have lost intelligence. it would explain the birds in bugs life.

  3. muy buena teoria pero como puedes explicar los logos e imagenes escondidas de cars en toystory?

    • Recuerda el punto en el que dice que Boo (Bruja) deja los huevos de pascua a proposito a traves del universo pixar dado que tiene todo en el taller.

  4. ya me puse pensativa, se supone en otra “teoria” dice que boo es la niña que dejo a jessy en el futuro, entonces, como puede ser ella la que desenboca todo esto?algine me ayuda a razonarlo por favor? necesito aclarar todo esto que surgio en mi mente

    • A ver. Según esta teoría, Boo empieza a desarrollar su propia magia, experimentando con las puertas de madera, que según va descubriendo son una buena fuente. Viaja hacia adelante y hacia atrás tratando de encontrar a “Gatito” (Sully); creo que esto encaja bastante bien con el resto de los “huevos de pascua”. De todas formas, no entendí demasiado a qué te referías con lo de que dejó a Jessie en el futuro (me parece que estaba entre sus juguetes, ¿no?). Creo que no podemos saber muy bien en qué momento exacto vivió Boo, aunque sí que fue mientras los humanos vivían. ¿Podría ser que, de hecho, fue una niña cuando Jessie, Woody y así eran comercializados?
      Es posible que haya malinterpretado tu comentario, pero esto es lo que pienso uwu. Saludos.

    • no, la dueña de jessie es la mama de andy, por eso el tiene el mismo sombrero rojo y emily era rubia, asimismo lo es la mama de andy, amenos que boo sea la mama de andy :O pero porque era rubia? eso no encaja

      • ¡Son dos muñecas de Jessie distintas! Te estás olvidando de eso 🙂
        Jessie no era una muñeca única y especial que nadie más tenía (?) sino que fueron varias muñecas comercializadas ampliamente, de la misma manera en que vemos a muchos Buzz en Toy Story 2, cuando van a la juguetería. Boo fue niña cuando Emily lo fue, así de simple.

  5. Where do the short films (Luxo jr, Boundin, Partly Cloudy, ect) fit in? I think Partly Cloudy is interesting since it might contradict Up, since Ellie couldn’t get pregnant.

  6. I saw the trailer for Inside Out and I realized the people in the head look like the monsters in Monsters Inc.
    Is it possible the consciouses are some how related to the monsters?

    • Until Inside Out is released, I won’t say much about the movie. How can I? But I do strongly believe there is zero connection. The emotions have a clear, distinct animation style and texture compared to the monsters. And their origins clearly don’t relate at all. The monsters are animal/human hybrids, but the emotions don’t have any animal characteristics at all.

      • Could Bing Bong (Reilly imaginary friend) be a monster who visited Reilly for laugh energy?

  7. And BIG HERO 6 is after “a bugs life” or sometime between toy stroy and cars?

    • Big Her 6 isn’t even pixar.

  8. But what about Ice Age i mean, animal are intelligent, please contact with me

    Twitter: @luistazon

      • To Mr. Negroni:
        I was wondering if the Pixar short films such as The Adventures of Andre and Wally B and Lifted apply to this theory. I guess a few such as Tin Toy do because of their relation to the theory, but what about the others? I consider this theory intriguing, so if these shorts relate in any way, my interest level would increase.

  9. Please talk about Boo, do you agree with what everyone thinks, that she is andy’s mom? I would love to read what you think about it, where Boo fits in the timeline? how early in time she discovers the monsters?

    These are my thoughts: Boo must have discovered the Monsters before Toy S. then she grew up as Emily (ignorin’ the real name of Boo), had kids (andy and andy’s sister) and still lived obssesed with the monsters (Sully) and that’s why she ‘divorced’ Andy’s Dad and is not wearing ring because she really is in love with Sully, not that andy’s dad was bad.. but he noticed her obsession with ‘something’ she never talks about, because she was too busy trying to develope magic.. eventually his Dad left the family because he couldn’t bear her behaviour anymore..

    Then she became a Witch which travels in time leaving easter eggs.. Oh, of course Boo should have changed things a bit when she travels back to the Dark Ages, and other times, to use wood.. that’s why there are super heroes, animals who can read and act as humans, etc.. is all a cycle..

    So, I think pretty much Boo existed before Toy Story, she travels in time after becoming a witch leaving the toys who can feel and act (thats why she never knew about Jesse, Woody, etc, she was busy thinkin’ about Sully), her other self (the witch) left those easter eggs as she traveled back~ hmm.. i don’t know what you guys think..

    • Hey Seth, no Boo is not Andy’s mom. Boo’s real name is Mary, as evidenced by her putting her name on the corner of the drawing she made at Mike and Sulley’s house (it’s also the name of her voice actor).

      The only thing linking Boo with Andy is the Jessie doll, but honestly, there’s no indication that they’re the same doll. It’s just as likely that Boo owns a different Jessie doll that’s a hand-me-down. Also, I think you’re confused about Boo’s name. Sulley named her “Boo;” it’s not her real name.

      And no, she’s not in love with Sulley. That’s just…no. Sulley was a father figure to her. Just…no.

  10. Yo creo que la bruja llevó a Jessie a la época de Boo (jessie ya era animada por su magia), entonces Boo creció como Emily, y nunca supo que Jessie sentía y pensaba como humana; eventualmente Emily (Boo) recuerda su obesión por Sully y crece siendo la mamá de Andy, se divorcia del padre (por que el padre sabe que tiene una obsesión de la cuál ella nunca habla), se convierte en una bruja que descubre como viajar en el tiempo por medio de puertas como los Monsters lo hacían en su intento de encontrar nuevamente a Sully. Ahí es donde cambia la historia un poco y desde que ella era Boo los Juguetes Animados existen.. (me explico?) intenté explicarlo en inglés pero me hice bolas hahaha!

  11. Se você parar para pensar uma outra confirmação de que os as maquinas queria dominar os humanos e no filme ” family the future ” onde as máquinas manipulava o gub ate dominar o mundo

  12. That’s because cars is in it’s own universe. Where there is no humans. There never have been humans in the world of cars. This theory of all the pixar movie in a signal universe doesn’t work because cars has it own past. Sorry you need stop trying to fit them together. It doesn’t work. Boo is also not the witch in brave wrong eye color.

    • But there’s very little evidence that everything in the world is made just for cars and wasn’t originally made by humans (or at least wasn’t tweaked/modified to suit cars a bit better). Also, both Boo and the witch from Brave have brown eyes (Boo’s are a darker brown whereas the witch has a more hazel eye colour, but eye colour changes shade from when you’re a child. Mine for instance were bright blue until I was five, now they’re darker with a green tint.

  13. Hi my loved one! I wish to say that this article is amazing, nice
    written and come with almost all important infos. I would like to peer
    more posts like this .

  14. Now, I have a question: what happened with the few human that were left after wall-e’s movie, they just extinguished? And if they did; how?

    • Um, no. They lived. The monsters in Monster’s Inc either are mutated human-animal hybrids, or perhaps just mutated animals that grew more intelligent and evolved past humans. The humans have since died off, since the radiation that mutated the animals (or animal-human hybrids) killed them. Plus, it’s like a thousand years after Wall-E that Monster’s Inc takes place.

  15. If the human beings does not exist in the movie Bugs,the moment in which a child pulled the wings of a bug of the street on the 1.07.19′ of the movie. How it explain?

    • You have to read it a little closer. He talks about that here: “Yes, there are some humans, like the kid who allegedly picked the wings off of the homeless bug, but that still fits in a post Wall-E world.”

  16. This theory could possibly be true but I noticed in some of the pixar movies had cameos before their movie even came out! I think that each of the cameos were associated with time travel.

  17. Hello, I have a Wattpad account which I made over the weekend and I am using to post the Spinoff to The Pixar Detective, as well as another novel I had. I am going to tell you my account name in March 3, the day the Newest Pixar Detective comes out. I am posting a sneak peak of the new Pixar Detective Spinoff, as well as other novel I am working on.

    P.S. Wattpad had shown me some wierd stuff. I had never noticed at all before. An example is that it shown me Dangan Rompa, which is a Japanese anime based on a video game. I recommend watching some of the anime.

  18. I am checking Jon Negroni’s site every hour in search of Part 2. I predict it to come out this week.

  19. But chiken little couldn’t be part of that teory? Because on the movie they are affected by the machines. (Just saying).

    • Chicken Little is not a Pixar Movie. Besides, John Lasseter wasn’t involved in Disney until 2007. Chicken Little was aired in 2005.

  20. I could honestly read this forever and ever <3 possibly one of my favourite ever theories, my jaw honestly dropped when I read this for the first time, I had to sit therein silence for a few minutes after to get my head around it. It made me cry, I’m in love!!!!!!!!!

    • Wow, you too? I have found my people. 😄🙌

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Jon Negroni

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading