The Pixar Theory

pixar theory

Every Pixar movie is connected. I explain how, and possibly why.

In 2012, I watched a video on Cracked.com that introduced the idea (at least to me) that all of the Pixar movies actually exist within the same universe. Since then, I’ve obsessed over this concept, working to complete what I call The Pixar Theory, a working narrative that ties all of the Pixar movies into one cohesive timeline with a main theme. Another, longer, title is “The Grand Unifying Theory of Pixar Movies.”

This theory covers every feature-length movie made by Pixar Animation Studios since 1995. They include:

  • Toy Story
  • A Bug’s Life
  • Toy Story 2
  • Monsters Inc.
  • Finding Nemo
  • The Incredibles
  • Cars
  • Ratatouille
  • Wall-E
  • Up
  • Toy Story 3
  • Cars 2
  • Brave
  • Monsters University
  • Inside Out (in Part 2)
  • The Good Dinosaur (in Part 3)
  • Finding Dory (in Part 4)
  • Cars 3, Coco, Incredibles 2, and Toy Story 4 will be included in the upcoming book

The point of this theory is to have fun and exercise your imagination while simultaneously finding interesting connections between these fantastic movies. The trick is not take any of it too seriously. If you would like to experience a shorter version of this theory, check out the visualized Pixar Theory Timeline. 

In fact, I highly suggest you watch this video I made with Screen Junkies/Fandom below. It more thoroughly lays out this theory and its most complex ideas. It’s also a far more “current” version of the theory compared to the rest of this post. Plus, it has more movies included! Enjoy.

The original Pixar Theory:

As of this writing in 2013, Brave is the first and last movie in the timeline. Obviously, this movie about a Scottish kingdom during the Dark Ages is the earliest time period covered by the Pixar films, but it’s also the only Pixar movie that actually explains why animals in the Pixar universe behave like humans sometimes.

Pixar Theory

In Brave, Merida discovers that there is “magic” that can solve her problems but inadvertently turns her mother into a bear. We find out that this magic comes from an odd witch seemingly connected to the mysterious will-of-the-wisps. Not only do we see animals behaving like humans, but we also see brooms (inanimate objects) behaving like people in the witch’s shop.

We also learn that this witch inexplicably disappears every time she passes through doors, leading us to believe that she may not even exist. Don’t get ahead of me, but we’ll come back to Brave. Let’s just say that for now, the witch is someone we know from a different movie in the timeline.

Pixar Theory

[Some of you have pointed out that the animals in Brave gradually regress back into an animal state, disproving the idea that this is the source of animals acting like humans. My rebuttal is simple. They regress because the magic wears off. Over time, their evolving intelligence grows naturally.]

Centuries later, the animals from Brave that have been experimented on by the witch have interbred, creating a large-scale population of animals slowly gaining personification and intelligence on their own.

There are two progressions: the progression of the animals and the progression of artificial intelligence. The events of the following movies set up a power struggle between humans, animals, and machines.

The stage for all-out war in regards to animals is set by Ratatouille, Finding Nemo, and Up, in that order. Notice I left out A Bug’s Life, but I’ll explain why later.

In Ratatouille, we see animals experimenting with their growing personification in small, controlled experiments.

Pixar Theory

Remy wants to cook, which is something only humans explicitly do. He crafts a relationship with a small group of humans and finds success. Meanwhile, the villain of Ratatouille, Chef Skinner, disappears. What happened to him? What did he do with his newfound knowledge that animals were capable of transcending their instincts and performing duties better than humans?

It’s possible that Charles Muntz, the antagonist of Up, learned of this startling rumor, giving him the idea to begin inventing devices that would harness the thoughts of animals, namely his dogs, through translator collars. Those collars indicated to Muntz that animals are smarter and more like humans than we think. He needed this technology to find the exotic bird he’s obsessed over, and he even comments on how many dogs he’s lost since he arrived in South America.

Pixar Theory

But then Dug and the rest of his experiments are set free after Muntz’s demise, and we don’t know the full implications of that, but what we do know is that animosity between the animals and humans is growing steadily. Now that humans have discovered the potential of animals, they are beginning to cross the line. To develop this new technology, the humans begin an industrial revolution hinted at in Up.

[Some have pointed out that Muntz was working in South America before the events of Ratatouille. This is true, but it is not explicitly stated how and when he developed the collars. Also, we know Ratatouille takes place before Up for several reasons. In Toy Story 3, a postcard on Andy’s wall has Carl and Ellie’s name and address on it (including their last names to confirm). This confirms that in 2010, the time of Toy Story 3, Ellie is still alive or hasn’t been dead long. This supports the idea that Up takes place years later.]

Pixar Theory

In the beginning of Up, Carl is forced to give up his house to a corporation because they are expanding the city.

Wait a second. What corporation is guilty for polluting the earth and wiping out life in the distant future because of technological overreach?

Pixar Theory

Buy-n-Large (BNL), a corporation that runs just about everything by the time we get to Wall-E. In the“History of BNL” commercial from the movie, we’re told that BNL has even taken over the world governments. Did you catch that this one corporation achieved global dominance? Interestingly, this is the same organization alluded to in Toy Story 3:

Pixar Theory

In Finding Nemo, we have an entire population of sea creatures uniting to save a fish that was captured by humans. BNL shows up again in this universe via another news article that talks about a beautiful underwater world.

Lines are being crossed. Humans are beginning to antagonize the increasingly networked and intelligent animals.

Think about Dory from Finding Nemo for a second. She stands apart from most of the other fish. Why? She isn’t as intelligent. Her short-term memory loss is likely a result of her not being as advanced as the other sea creatures, which is a reasonable explanation for how rapidly these creatures are evolving.

Pixar Theory

It’s likely that the sequel to Finding Nemo, which is about Dory, will touch on this and further explain why. We may also get some more evidence pointing to animosity between humans and animals.

[Some great users have pointed out that Dory is actually more intelligent and shows signs of growth due to her ability to read and communicate with whales. This would actually show signs of how the animals are beginning to change in intelligence gradually.]

And that is the furthest movie in the “animal” side of things. When it comes to A.I., we start with The Incredibles. Who is the main villain of this movie? You probably thought of Buddy, a.ka. Syndrome, who basically commits genocide on super-powered humans.

Pixar Theory

Or does he? Buddy didn’t have any powers. He used technology to enact revenge on Mr. Incredible for not taking him seriously. Seems a little odd that the man went so far as to commit genocide.

[A lot of people have been arguing about where The Incredibles actually takes place because we see technology from modern times and the 1980s even though everything has a 1960s vibe. This is cleared by Brad Bird, the director, who says the movie takes place in an alternate 1960s, which means the movie opens in the 1950s.]

And how does he kill all of the supers? He creates the omnidroid, an A.I. “killbot” that learns the moves of every super-human and adapts. When Mr. Incredible is first told about this machine, Mirage mentions that it is an advanced artificial intelligence that has gone rogue.

Mr. Incredible points out that it got smart enough to wonder why it had to take orders.  The omnidroid eventually turns on Syndrome, and starts attacking humans in the city. Why would an A.I. want to just attack randomly? Do machines have an inherent hatred of humans?

The movie even shows clips of the superheroes with capes being done in by inanimate objects, such as plane turbines…accidentally.

Pixar Theory

Pixar Theory

But why would machines want to get rid of humans in the first place? We know that animals don’t like humans because they are polluting the Earth and experimenting on them, but why would the machines have an issue?

Enter Toy Story. Here we see humans using and discarding “objects” that are clearly sentient. Yes, the toys love it Uncle Tom style, but over the course of the Toy Story sequels, we see toys becoming fed up. But wait, toys and inanimate objects aren’t necessarily machines, so how do they have some kind of intelligence?

Syndrome points to the answer. He tells Mr. Incredible that his lasers are powered by Zero Point Energy. This is the electromagnetic energy that exists in a vacuum. It’s the unseen energy we find in wavelengths and a reasonable explanation for how toys and objects in the Pixar world draw power.

Pixar Theory

By the events of the Toy Story movies, we are in the 90s until 2010. It’s been 40-50 years or so since the events of The Incredibles, giving A.I. plenty of time to develop BNL.

Meanwhile, Pixar is hinting at dissatisfaction among pockets of toy civilizations. The toys rise up against Sid in the first movie. Jesse resents her owner, Emily, for abandoning her. Lotso Huggin’ Bear straight up hates humans by the third movie.

Toys are obviously not satisfied with the status quo, providing a reason for why machines and objects alike are ready to take over.

So, by the 2000s, the super-humans are all but gone, and mankind is vulnerable. Animals, who want to rise up Planet of the Apes style, have the ability to take over, but we don’t see this happen.

Also, A.I. never takes over humans by force. Why do you think that is? It’s reasonable to assume that machines did take over, just not as we expected. The machines used BNL, a faceless corporation (which are basically faceless in nature) to dominate the world, starting in the 1960s after the Omnidroid fails to defeat the Incredibles.

In each of the Toy Story movies, it’s made painfully clear that sentient objects rely on humans for everything. For fulfillment and even energy. It’s hinted at that the Toys lose all life when put away in “storage” unless they are in a museum that will get them seen by humans.

Pixar Theory

So machines decide to control humans by using a corporation that suits their every need, leading to an industrial revolution that eventually leads to…pollution. When the animals rise up against the humans to stop them from polluting the earth, who will save them? The machines.

We know that the machines will win the war, too, because after this war, there are almost no animals left on Earth. Who’s left?

Pixar Theory

Because the machines tip everything out of balance, Earth becomes an unfit planet for humans and animals, so the remaining humans are put on Axiom (or Noah’s Ark if you want to carry on the Biblical theme where Wall-E is basically Robot Jesus and his love interest is aptly named Eve) as a last-ditch effort to save the human race.

Pixar Theory

On Axiom, the humans have no purpose aside from having their needs met by the machines. The machines have made humans dependent on them for everything because that is how they were treated as “toys.” It’s all they know.

Pixar Theory

Meanwhile on Earth, machines are left behind to populate the world and run things, explaining human landmarks and traditions still being prominent in Cars. There are no animals or humans in this version of Earth because they’re all gone, but we do know that the planet still has many human influences left.

[Some have noted that the world of Cars can’t be after humans left because there’s no pollution shown in the movies. If you look carefully at Wall-E, however, the world is never shown during this time, so we don’t really know how badly the Earth was polluted.]

[It’s possible that the machines sent humans away to curb overpopulation and fix the environment without them, but the world was drained of resources as a result of machines populating the Earth. That would explain why the machines abandoned Earth entirely, leaving only Wall-E behind.]

In Cars 2, the cars go to Europe and Japan, making it plain that this is all taking place on Earth as we know it. So what happened to the cars? We’ve learned by now that humans are the source of energy for the machines. That’s why they never got rid of them.

In Wall-E, they point out that BNL intended to bring the humans back once the planet was clean again, but they failed. The machines on Earth eventually died out, though we don’t know how.

Pixar Theory

What we do know is that there is an energy crisis in Cars 2, with oil being the only way society trudges on despite its dangers. We even learn that the Allinol corporation was using “green energy” as a catalyst for a fuel war in order to turn cars away from alternative energy sources. That “clean” fuel could have been used to wipe out many of the cars, very quickly.

Pixar Theory

[Someone pointed out that “all in all” means the same thing as “by and large” making the connection between Cars and Wall-E even more substantial.]

Which brings us back to Wall-E. Have you ever wondered why Wall-E was the only machine left? We know that the movie begins 800 years after humans have left Earth on Axiom, governed by the AutoPilot (another A.I. reference).

Could it be that Wall-E’s fascination with human culture and friendship with a cockroach is what allowed him to keep finding fulfillment and the ability to maintain his personality? That’s why he was special and liberated the humans.

He remembered the times when humans and machines lived in peace, away from all of the pollution caused by both sides.

Pixar Theory

After Wall-E liberates the humans and they rebuild society back on Earth, what happens then? During the end credits of Wall-E, we see the shoe that contains the last of plant life. It grows into a mighty tree. A tree that strikingly resembles the central tree in A Bug’s Life.

Pixar Theory

Pixar Theory

Pixar Theory

That’s right. The reason no humans show up in A Bug’s Life is because there aren’t a lot left. We know because of the cockroach that some of the insects survived, meaning they would have rebounded a bit faster, though the movie had to be far enough in the timeline for birds to have returned as well, though they’re noticeably less intelligent than the bugs.

[I’ll admit, the trees looking similar isn’t enough to support the idea that A Bug’s Life takes place after Wall-E, but there’s definitely more reasons for why it’s likely. Also, I’ll bring the tree up again later because it appears in Up as well.]

There’s something strikingly different about A Bug’s Life when compared to other Pixar portrayals of animals, which leads me to believe it takes place in the future. Unlike Ratatouille, Up, and Finding Nemo, the bugs have many human activities similar to what the rats in Ratatouille were merely experimenting with.

The bugs have cities, bars, advertisements, their own machines, know what a bloody mary is and even have a traveling circus. This all assumes that the movie is in a different time period.

The other factor that sets A Bug’s Life apart from other Pixar movies is the fact that it is the only one, besides Cars and Cars 2, that doesn’t revolve (or even include) humans.

Pixar Theory

[Okay there is a a lot of contention over the idea that A Bug’s Life takes place post-apocalypse, but hear me out. The reason I am so inclined to push the idea is because of how different the bug world is from the “animal” movies. No other Pixar movie has animals wearing clothing, wild inventions, animals creating machines, or so much human influence like bars and cities.]

[In Finding Nemo, the most human thing we see is a school, and even that is pretty stripped down. But in A Bug’s Life, we have a world where humans are barely even implied. At one point, one of the ants tells Flik not to leave the island because there are “snakes, birds, and bigger bugs out there.” He doesn’t even bring up humans.

[Yes, there are some humans, like the kid who allegedly picked the wings off of the homeless bug, but that still fits in a post Wall-E world. Also, the bugs have to be irradiated for them to live such long lifespans. The average lifespan of an ant is just 3 months, but these ants all survive an entire summer and allude to being around for quite some time by saying things like “this happens every year.” One of the ants even says he “feels 90 again.” That works if you accept that the ants are sturdier due to evolution and mutated genes.]

There’s another Pixar movie that was supposed to be released in 2012, but it was cancelled and replaced with Brave. This movie was called Newt, and I believe it might have fit in this part of the timeline post-Wall-E. The movie’s supposed plot: “What happens when the last remaining male and female blue-footed newts on the planet are forced together by science to save the species, and they can’t stand each other?” 

Pixar Theory

A movie about an endangered species rebuilding itself could lend itself nicely to this theory, but since the movie was never released, I’m just speculating.

So what happens next? Humanity, machines, and animals grow in harmony to the point where a new super species is born. Monsters. The monsters civilization is actually Earth in the incredibly distant future.

[Someone wisely pointed out that in Monsters University, the college is said to be founded in 1313. If we’re really in the future, then that means the monsters could have reset society and begun using their own calendar. That could mean Monsters Inc. takes place up to 1400 (or more) years after A Bug’s Life.]

Where did they come from? It’s possible that the monsters are simply the personified animals mutated after the diseased earth was irradiated for 800 years.

[Not during Wall-E. I would guess that it took hundreds of years after Wall-E for the animals to become monsters]

Pixar Theory

Whatever the reason, these monsters seem to all look like horribly mutated animals, only larger and civilized. They have cities and even colleges, as we see in Monsters University.

[An issue some have found is that this doesn’t properly explain what happened to humans. I haven’t settled on a theory I really like yet, but I’m leaning towards the idea that monsters and machines eventually forgot that they need humans and got rid of them again, not realizing their mistake until all humans died out. Another explanation is that humans just couldn’t survive on Earth anymore.]

In Monsters Inc., they have an energy crisis because they are in a future earth without humans. Humans are the source of energy, but thanks to the machines, again, the Monsters find a way to use doors to travel to the human world. Only, it’s not different dimensions.

Pixar Theory

The monsters are going back in time. They’re harvesting energy to keep from becoming extinct by going back to when humans were most prominent. The peak of civilization, if you will. Though a lot of time has passed, animosity towards humans never really went away for animals/monsters.

Monsters must have relied on anti-human instincts to believe that just touching a human would corrupt their world like it did in the past. So they scare humans to gather their energy until they realize that laughter (green energy) is more efficient because it is positive in nature.

[An alternative explanation that fits even better that some of you brought up: The machines and monsters created the time travel doors but realized that messing with time could erase their existence and change history. So, they falsely trained monsters to believe that humans are toxic and from another dimension, making it suicide for a monster to interact too much with their world.]

[Another issue is how the monsters seem to worry about kids “being less scared these days.” It’s likely that going in the past takes a lot of energy, so the monsters can only go back as far as the practice still returns a profit in energy. To them, they’re just moving through the same dimension of time, but the monsters at the top know that eventually, they’ll run out. This is why Waternose is so bent on capturing children and enslaving them.]

We even see a connection between A Bug’s Life and Monsters Inc. via the trailer we see in both movies. As you can see, the trailer looks exactly the same, except the one in A Bug’s Life is noticeably older and more decrepit, while the one in Monsters Inc. (where Randall is sent via a door) has humans and looks newer.

Pixar Theory

Look at the picture above. On the left is the trailer from A Bug’s Life and the one on the right is from Monsters Inc. The one on the left looks older and more rundown. Even the vegetation is noticeably dryer and there’s less of it. The trailer on the right has humans and the frame even includes tall grass and a tree hanging overhead.

[Some have argued that the trailer in A Bug’s Life should be nothing but dust. I disagree based on how barely intact other buildings were in Wall-E. They also bring up the bug zapper that is powered by electricity. The zapper could easily be solar powered, just like Wall-E. The bugs probably used it as a light source to signal other bugs to “Bug City.” Also, the trailer in A Bug’s Life never shows lights in the trailer like it does for Monsters Inc.]

That said, Monsters Inc. is so far the most futuristic Pixar movie. By the end, humans, animals, and machines have finally found a way to understand each other and live harmoniously.

And then there’s Boo. What do you think happened to her? She saw everything take place in future earth where “kitty” was able to talk. She became obsessed with finding out what happened to her friend Sully and why animals in her time weren’t quite as smart as the ones she’d seen in the future.

She remembers that “doors” are the key to how she found Sully in the first place and becomes…

Pixar Theory

A WITCH. Yes, Boo is the witch from Brave. She figures out how to travel in time to find Sully, and goes back to what she believes is the source: The will-of-the-wisps.

They are what started everything, and as a witch, she cultivates this magic in an attempt to find Sully by creating doors going backwards and forwards in time.

[Just to clarify: The theory is that Boo discovered a way to use doors to travel through time on her own, possibly by developing magic on her own. She probably went back in time to the Dark Ages to get more magic from the will-o-wisps.]

How do we know? In Brave, you can briefly see a drawing in the workshop. It’s Sully.

Pixar Theory

We even see the Pizza Planet truck carved as a wooden toy in her shop, which makes no sense unless she’s seen one before…(and I’m sure she has since that truck is in almost every Pixar movie). If you look closely, you can see the carved truck below.

Pixar Theory

You remember Merida opening doors and the witch constantly disappearing? It’s because those doors are made the same way from Monsters Inc. They transport across time and that is why Merida couldn’t find the witch later in the movie.

[A lot of people have brought up how easter eggs are scattered throughout all the Pixar movies. I barely scratch the surface, but a great theory offered by some that I support is that these easter eggs are planted by Boo either intentionally or accidentally as she travels through time to find Sully. Some support for that is the fact that every easter egg in Brave lies in her workshop.]

But wait. How did Boo travel in time in the first place, and why is she obsessed with wood? Boo must have discovered that wood has been the source of energy all along, not just humans. The machines and monsters in Monsters Inc. use doors because they’re made of wood and found a way to use that energy to travel in time.

[Many have pointed out how the door that banishes monsters is metal. That’s probably because wood is used to harness this magic, and using a metal door would stop a banished monster from going back through it.]

Obsessed with finding Sully, Boo travelled across the Pixar universe using doors.

[It’s even possible that the wood from the tree in A Bug’s Life is the source of Flik’s ingenuity, due to his fascination and respect for seeds growing into trees. The tree also bears a resemblance to the one in Up that Carl and Ellie frequented, which could be the source of Carl’s wild creativity in using balloons to transport his house.]

[This also explains why Flik and Heimlich from A Bug’s Life show up in Toy Story 2, which would be centuries before their time. Boo was trying to go to the future and could have fallen short by landing in the post-Wall-E time. She would need wood to keep time traveling, but there’s not much around yet, so she stumbles upon the tree in A Bug’s Life. She could have accidentally brought back a few bugs with her when traveling backwards in time.]

So Boo went back to the Dark Ages, probably because she could use plenty of wood there for her experiments or to study the will-o-wisps. We know that her first encounter with Mor’du ended with her turning him into a monstrous bear, but he regresses.

She probably wanted to turn him into a bear because Sully resembles a bear, and she is still trying to figure out where Sully comes from.

Does Boo ever find Sully? I like to think so. He surely reunited with her at least once as a child at the end of Monsters Inc., but eventually, he had to stop visiting.

But her love for Sully is, after all, the crux of the entire Pixar universe. The love of different people of different ages and even different species finding ways to live on Earth without destroying it because of a lust for energy.

And that is the Pixar Theory.

For Inside OutThe Good Dinosaur, and Finding Dory, the story continues in Parts 2,3, and 4  respectively, so here are some other helpful links for your reading pleasure:


Thanks for reading this. Be sure to say hey on Twitter: @JonNegroni

All images courtesy of Disney/Pixar

11,110 thoughts on “The Pixar Theory

  1. Boo is the Witch wow mind blown

  2. in monsters inc. at the beginning, the scare simulater human looks like it could be andy as a kid. any thoughts.

    • I thought it looked more like Sid

    • That wasn’t Pixar, it was Disney Animation Studios, which is what Disney use for their own movies. Pixar write their movies themselves

    • Tangled is not a pixar movie.Tangled was purely a product of the Walt Disney Animation Studios. Pixar had nothing to do with the film. If you look on the poster, you only find Disney’s logo, no Pixar logo.

    • Tangeled isn’t pixar.

  3. Your theory is indeed pretty good, even so I have one and only one question about this. In monsters inc they said, if I am not wrong “the kids these days are harder to scare” that because of movies and technology. So if the method they used is time travel like in this theory, ¿why would they say “kids these days” when they could just travel to an earlier time?

    • It may have been more likely to change the present more the farther back you went, making the time travel more dangerous.

    • there is only a certain amount of nights that kids can be scared, so after a while, you have to do further into the future

      • no the monsters went back in time

    • Maybe there is a doctor who type thing where you can’t
      travel to the same time twice so they keep useing up time so they have to keep moving forward in time.

    • As the monsters go back in time and scare the kids they alter the past by scaring them, thus making them more resistant to future scares (“The kids these days” meaning kids that have become less reactive to fear/monsters).
      OR
      After you change the future with a scare (scare1) you cant go back further and change it (scare 2) because then you would change the future by having scare1 potentially re-written. This would ‘delete’ the energy brought from that scare in the future. With this principle by going back you may ‘delete’ hundreds of thousands of scares that would have happened because of one past scare that changed the future outcome. (example: the monsters scare 15 kids in March, then they scare 1 kid in February [before the 15 kids in the kids timeline, after the 15 kids in the monsters timeline], that 1 kid tells her friends [the 15 kids] that a monster burst from her door and scared her, the kids now paranoid expect the monsters and prepare for the scare by blocking the doors, sleeping in another room, or staying up and expecting the scare. Now the 15 scares that had been collected are changed and the energy is lost.)
      Basically by going back they potentially lose energy by changing the future. You can only go further in time. The monsters may have even experimented by trying to go back further but ended up losing massive amount of power thus creating the energy shortage.

    • Also, that was simply an expression by the monster. If the kids they had been scaring were part of the past then they’d have to gradually move forward in time because they can’t scare the same kid on the same night more than once, and this would change time to make kids adapt and be harder to scare.

  4. The dinosaurs in “The good dinosaur” could be evolved from monsters in “Monsters inc”. If the film involves humans there are two possibilities.
    One-it still is set after “Monsters inc” and monsters have taken humans forward in time-or two-the witch or “Bo” turned some people into dinosaurs

    • What if the monsters in Monsters inc. Evolved into dinosaurs over millions of years, then the meteor never whips them out, meaning that monsters inc. and all the other pixar movies take place millions if not billions of years before the good dinosaur.

  5. this is blowing my mind

  6. Just thinking about the humans and animals/bugs breading some time in the future. It could be something like dna splicing or combining to over come the hardships of that future world this would account for the humans being animal/bug like. Maybe the changing in human dna messed up the zero energy hence the need to farm it.

    Rex could have been a dormant AI that recreated himself at some point from the ship in wall e.

    As for Boo maybe she is using technology and not “magic” a lot of things that cant be explained because they don’t know yet so everything is magic. She could have invented the technology looking for her friends and creates that alternative time line. But that would lead that the doors were going to different dimensions or maybe the doors only go one way into the past. Nice theory!

  7. be a pro
    NAILED IT
    due youre a geinus mind blow!

  8. Great artice. There are very few gaps in the story and will probably be filled at a later date. You should look into the show Gravity Falls. It’s a bit more sinister than it seems. Hint: illuminate. Sorry about my poor spelling skills!

  9. I just thought of something that might be worth putting in to this theory, in monsters inc, boo sings “beauty and the beast” in the bathroom. Is it possible that boo turned the guy in beauty in the beast into the beast? maybe because she wanted sully?

    • That is a good idea, but that’s Disney. Although, maybe it did happen and Disney are telling it as a tale, as it does start in a sort of story-book/fairytale way “Once Upon a time, in a far away land”, the far away land being the Pixar Universe!

      • Also, the message the witch is trying to impose is very true to this theory. About harmony between humans/animals/(machines) as he has to “learn to love another and earn her love in return” then his spell would be broken.

  10. This is all fine and good, but if Boo is the witch… the witch that set all this in motion… how’d it get started so Boo could interact with the evolved animals/monsters in the first place.

    It’s like the non-sensical timeline of the original planet of the apes (a child of evolved apes is the catalyst for the evolution of the apes.) how can something or someone come from some origin only to become the origin themselves. Without the witch, Boo’s life doesn’t have Monsters in yet, and without Monsters Boo doesn’t go to become the witch… So?

    • simple, in a separate timeline, boo figures out the magic by chance, and starts time-traveling for research on increasing the IQ of animals, starting the loop that causes the pixar stoyline

      • That’s not simple. This theory is predicated on it being one universe; if characters are traveling in different timelines now why bother with evolution, and planet destruction/human salvation if everything can be happening in deprecate timelines an the far future doors of Monsters can be used to go to other timelines to save the planet, or the supers, or stop BNL, etc.

        Seperate and distinct timelines is a cop out.

    • It does work. Time is cyclical. We learned that from the terminator.

      • It’s cyclical yes, but it changes too. If George McFly doesn’t take Lorraine to the dance, Marty isn’t born. You can’t be your own grandpa, and by extension, you can’t be the reason your evolution happens the way it does.

        Lets reverse engineer this; let’s say Boo doesn’t go back, she doesn’t use “magic” she doesn’t care about Sully after the age of 9– or she dies a year after meeting Sully. Who goes on to become the witch? Who causes the animals to be more human like? Who causes the evolution of animals into Monsters? How does Boo meet Sully if no witch was ever around, and in turn nothing evolved for Sully be come into existence? Some other witch?

    • You know you’re disputing the time paradox that continues to stump everyone’s minds even today, right? The endless cycle of Boo going back in time and causing this to happen via time travel is just pretty much a postulate in this theory.

      • Exactly, the paradox makes this theory impossible. We can’t just give that to him in order for the rest of the theory to makes sense… it’s too big a hurdle.

  11. Very interesting, I can’t wait to see more added!

  12. What about The Croods? There was weird creatures in that one, so is it possible that in that time period the weird creatures had existed, died off at some point, then were rebirthed again as the monsters?

  13. Actually, the theory that Bug’s Life took place after Toy Story is flawed due to the fact that in Toy Story, the toys are seen reading a Bug’s life book and Andy has a bug’s life calendar. Also, it is impossible that Boo is leaving Easter eggs, because Easter Eggs are merely objects or characters that make cameos in multiple movies (i.e. the pizza truck from toy story) therefor it is impossible for too to leave items such as a pizza truck behind.

  14. One interesting thing to mention is that in A Bug’s Life, we see the protagonist (Flik) creating machines (not energy), which shows a new evolution. In the film they create giant machines (the bird) and starts the beginning of a evolution.
    And you ask “What’s interesting about that?”. Interestingly, in timeline shows the next movie Monsters, Inc. In the film they are monsters
    and some resemble insects and animals, such as Randall, the chameleon, and Roz, a slug, and one of the protagonists Sulley, who in the film is called “kitty” by Boo. My theory is that part that animals could evolve and become the dominant species. “But some of them do not look like insects and animals” the humans have giant hair or tails? The evolution changes several things in kind (if you want to know more will study the theory of evolution).
    And as there is more energy sources, they go back in time to seek energy of humans to supply them. (I’m sorry if the spelling is not right, it’s because I’m Brazilian and I am using Google Translate to translate)

  15. I loved this! This is truly amazing!

  16. Reblogged this on Hungry, Foolish Me! and commented:
    I have heard of the Pixar Theory before too, but this article has opened a whole new dimension to my thoughts. I hope everyone enjoys this mind blowing article!

  17. You say the incredibles was based in the 1960’s. if so then why is the technology so advanced, and why does frozone have a flat screen tv in his apartment and not an old CRT tv?

    If I am wrong on this I am sorry I am working from memory.

  18. I would like to see a sequel of both wall-e and incredibles, to clarify your theories.
    What if, and this is a wild theory, supers emerge again, and their are once agin three dominant races in the world? It would be the only way Pixar could ever come to a decisive finish, because that beats recycling old ideas again and again forever. Then we could see more of movies that came between brave and the finale, to fill in gaps.

  19. Holy crap! This is awesome! Keep it up!

  20. The Pixar short “boundin’ ” has intelligent intelligent animals in it, the song is also about getting back up again and “rebound”ing which suggests the animals rebound and fight against the humans. Can you pick anything out from this?

  21. You do realize that disney and pixar like to put things in their movies to see if you notice them?

  22. god damn it you made me think

  23. The witch from brave also has a randal craved in a sort of stick and randal was her monster

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Jon Negroni

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading