
Every Pixar movie is connected. I explain how, and possibly why.
In 2012, I watched a video on Cracked.com that introduced the idea (at least to me) that all of the Pixar movies actually exist within the same universe. Since then, Iâve obsessed over this concept, working to complete what I call The Pixar Theory, a working narrative that ties all of the Pixar movies into one cohesive timeline with a main theme. Another, longer, title is “The Grand Unifying Theory of Pixar Movies.”
This theory covers every feature-length movie made by Pixar Animation Studios since 1995. They include:
- Toy Story
- A Bugâs Life
- Toy Story 2
- Monsters Inc.
- Finding Nemo
- The Incredibles
- Cars
- Ratatouille
- Wall-E
- Up
- Toy Story 3
- Cars 2
- Brave
- Monsters University
- Inside Out (in Part 2)
- The Good Dinosaur (in Part 3)
- Finding Dory (in Part 4)
- Cars 3, Coco, Incredibles 2, and Toy Story 4 will be included in the upcoming book
The point of this theory is to have fun and exercise your imagination while simultaneously finding interesting connections between these fantastic movies. The trick is not take any of it too seriously. If you would like to experience a shorter version of this theory, check out the visualized Pixar Theory Timeline.Â
In fact, I highly suggest you watch this video I made with Screen Junkies/Fandom below. It more thoroughly lays out this theory and its most complex ideas. It’s also a far more “current” version of the theory compared to the rest of this post. Plus, it has more movies included! Enjoy.
The original Pixar Theory:
As of this writing in 2013, Brave is the first and last movie in the timeline. Obviously, this movie about a Scottish kingdom during the Dark Ages is the earliest time period covered by the Pixar films, but itâs also the only Pixar movie that actually explains why animals in the Pixar universe behave like humans sometimes.

In Brave, Merida discovers that there is âmagicâ that can solve her problems but inadvertently turns her mother into a bear. We find out that this magic comes from an odd witch seemingly connected to the mysterious will-of-the-wisps. Not only do we see animals behaving like humans, but we also see brooms (inanimate objects) behaving like people in the witchâs shop.
We also learn that this witch inexplicably disappears every time she passes through doors, leading us to believe that she may not even exist. Donât get ahead of me, but weâll come back to Brave. Letâs just say that for now, the witch is someone we know from a different movie in the timeline.

[Some of you have pointed out that the animals in Brave gradually regress back into an animal state, disproving the idea that this is the source of animals acting like humans. My rebuttal is simple. They regress because the magic wears off. Over time, their evolving intelligence grows naturally.]
Centuries later, the animals from Brave that have been experimented on by the witch have interbred, creating a large-scale population of animals slowly gaining personification and intelligence on their own.
There are two progressions: the progression of the animals and the progression of artificial intelligence. The events of the following movies set up a power struggle between humans, animals, and machines.
The stage for all-out war in regards to animals is set by Ratatouille, Finding Nemo, and Up, in that order. Notice I left out A Bugâs Life, but Iâll explain why later.
In Ratatouille, we see animals experimenting with their growing personification in small, controlled experiments.

Remy wants to cook, which is something only humans explicitly do. He crafts a relationship with a small group of humans and finds success. Meanwhile, the villain of Ratatouille, Chef Skinner, disappears. What happened to him? What did he do with his newfound knowledge that animals were capable of transcending their instincts and performing duties better than humans?
Itâs possible that Charles Muntz, the antagonist of Up, learned of this startling rumor, giving him the idea to begin inventing devices that would harness the thoughts of animals, namely his dogs, through translator collars. Those collars indicated to Muntz that animals are smarter and more like humans than we think. He needed this technology to find the exotic bird heâs obsessed over, and he even comments on how many dogs heâs lost since he arrived in South America.

But then Dug and the rest of his experiments are set free after Muntzâs demise, and we donât know the full implications of that, but what we do know is that animosity between the animals and humans is growing steadily. Now that humans have discovered the potential of animals, they are beginning to cross the line. To develop this new technology, the humans begin an industrial revolution hinted at in Up.
[Some have pointed out that Muntz was working in South America before the events of Ratatouille. This is true, but it is not explicitly stated how and when he developed the collars. Also, we know Ratatouille takes place before Up for several reasons. In Toy Story 3, a postcard on Andy’s wall has Carl and Ellie’s name and address on it (including their last names to confirm). This confirms that in 2010, the time of Toy Story 3, Ellie is still alive or hasn’t been dead long. This supports the idea that Up takes place years later.]

In the beginning of Up, Carl is forced to give up his house to a corporation because they are expanding the city.
Wait a second. What corporation is guilty for polluting the earth and wiping out life in the distant future because of technological overreach?

Buy-n-Large (BNL), a corporation that runs just about everything by the time we get to Wall-E. In theâHistory of BNLâ commercial from the movie, weâre told that BNL has even taken over the world governments. Did you catch that this one corporation achieved global dominance? Interestingly, this is the same organization alluded to in Toy Story 3:

In Finding Nemo, we have an entire population of sea creatures uniting to save a fish that was captured by humans. BNL shows up again in this universe via another news article that talks about a beautiful underwater world.
Lines are being crossed. Humans are beginning to antagonize the increasingly networked and intelligent animals.
Think about Dory from Finding Nemo for a second. She stands apart from most of the other fish. Why? She isnât as intelligent. Her short-term memory loss is likely a result of her not being as advanced as the other sea creatures, which is a reasonable explanation for how rapidly these creatures are evolving.

Itâs likely that the sequel to Finding Nemo, which is about Dory, will touch on this and further explain why. We may also get some more evidence pointing to animosity between humans and animals.
[Some great users have pointed out that Dory is actually more intelligent and shows signs of growth due to her ability to read and communicate with whales. This would actually show signs of how the animals are beginning to change in intelligence gradually.]
And that is the furthest movie in the âanimalâ side of things. When it comes to A.I., we start with The Incredibles. Who is the main villain of this movie? You probably thought of Buddy, a.ka. Syndrome, who basically commits genocide on super-powered humans.

Or does he? Buddy didnât have any powers. He used technology to enact revenge on Mr. Incredible for not taking him seriously. Seems a little odd that the man went so far as to commit genocide.
[A lot of people have been arguing about where The Incredibles actually takes place because we see technology from modern times and the 1980s even though everything has a 1960s vibe. This is cleared by Brad Bird, the director, who says the movie takes place in an alternate 1960s, which means the movie opens in the 1950s.]
And how does he kill all of the supers? He creates the omnidroid, an A.I. âkillbotâ that learns the moves of every super-human and adapts. When Mr. Incredible is first told about this machine, Mirage mentions that it is an advanced artificial intelligence that has gone rogue.
Mr. Incredible points out that it got smart enough to wonder why it had to take orders. Â The omnidroid eventually turns on Syndrome, and starts attacking humans in the city. Why would an A.I. want to just attack randomly? Do machines have an inherent hatred of humans?
The movie even shows clips of the superheroes with capes being done in by inanimate objects, such as plane turbinesâŠaccidentally.


But why would machines want to get rid of humans in the first place? We know that animals donât like humans because they are polluting the Earth and experimenting on them, but why would the machines have an issue?
Enter Toy Story. Here we see humans using and discarding âobjectsâ that are clearly sentient. Yes, the toys love it Uncle Tom style, but over the course of the Toy Story sequels, we see toys becoming fed up. But wait, toys and inanimate objects arenât necessarily machines, so how do they have some kind of intelligence?
Syndrome points to the answer. He tells Mr. Incredible that his lasers are powered by Zero Point Energy. This is the electromagnetic energy that exists in a vacuum. Itâs the unseen energy we find in wavelengths and a reasonable explanation for how toys and objects in the Pixar world draw power.

By the events of the Toy Story movies, we are in the 90s until 2010. Itâs been 40-50 years or so since the events of The Incredibles, giving A.I. plenty of time to develop BNL.
Meanwhile, Pixar is hinting at dissatisfaction among pockets of toy civilizations. The toys rise up against Sid in the first movie. Jesse resents her owner, Emily, for abandoning her. Lotso Hugginâ Bear straight up hates humans by the third movie.
Toys are obviously not satisfied with the status quo, providing a reason for why machines and objects alike are ready to take over.
So, by the 2000s, the super-humans are all but gone, and mankind is vulnerable. Animals, who want to rise up Planet of the Apes style, have the ability to take over, but we donât see this happen.
Also, A.I. never takes over humans by force. Why do you think that is? Itâs reasonable to assume that machines did take over, just not as we expected. The machines used BNL, a faceless corporation (which are basically faceless in nature) to dominate the world, starting in the 1960s after the Omnidroid fails to defeat the Incredibles.
In each of the Toy Story movies, itâs made painfully clear that sentient objects rely on humans for everything. For fulfillment and even energy. Itâs hinted at that the Toys lose all life when put away in âstorageâ unless they are in a museum that will get them seen by humans.

So machines decide to control humans by using a corporation that suits their every need, leading to an industrial revolution that eventually leads toâŠpollution. When the animals rise up against the humans to stop them from polluting the earth, who will save them? The machines.
We know that the machines will win the war, too, because after this war, there are almost no animals left on Earth. Whoâs left?

Because the machines tip everything out of balance, Earth becomes an unfit planet for humans and animals, so the remaining humans are put on Axiom (or Noahâs Ark if you want to carry on the Biblical theme where Wall-E is basically Robot Jesus and his love interest is aptly named Eve) as a last-ditch effort to save the human race.

On Axiom, the humans have no purpose aside from having their needs met by the machines. The machines have made humans dependent on them for everything because that is how they were treated as âtoys.â Itâs all they know.

Meanwhile on Earth, machines are left behind to populate the world and run things, explaining human landmarks and traditions still being prominent in Cars. There are no animals or humans in this version of Earth because theyâre all gone, but we do know that the planet still has many human influences left.
[Some have noted that the world of Cars can’t be after humans left because there’s no pollution shown in the movies. If you look carefully at Wall-E, however, the world is never shown during this time, so we don’t really know how badly the Earth was polluted.]
[It’s possible that the machines sent humans away to curb overpopulation and fix the environment without them, but the world was drained of resources as a result of machines populating the Earth. That would explain why the machines abandoned Earth entirely, leaving only Wall-E behind.]
In Cars 2, the cars go to Europe and Japan, making it plain that this is all taking place on Earth as we know it. So what happened to the cars? Weâve learned by now that humans are the source of energy for the machines. Thatâs why they never got rid of them.
In Wall-E, they point out that BNL intended to bring the humans back once the planet was clean again, but they failed. The machines on Earth eventually died out, though we donât know how.

What we do know is that there is an energy crisis in Cars 2, with oil being the only way society trudges on despite its dangers. We even learn that the Allinol corporation was using âgreen energyâ as a catalyst for a fuel war in order to turn cars away from alternative energy sources. That âcleanâ fuel could have been used to wipe out many of the cars, very quickly.

[Someone pointed out that “all in all” means the same thing as “by and large” making the connection between Cars and Wall-E even more substantial.]
Which brings us back to Wall-E. Have you ever wondered why Wall-E was the only machine left? We know that the movie begins 800 years after humans have left Earth on Axiom, governed by the AutoPilot (another A.I. reference).
Could it be that Wall-Eâs fascination with human culture and friendship with a cockroach is what allowed him to keep finding fulfillment and the ability to maintain his personality? Thatâs why he was special and liberated the humans.
He remembered the times when humans and machines lived in peace, away from all of the pollution caused by both sides.

After Wall-E liberates the humans and they rebuild society back on Earth, what happens then? During the end credits of Wall-E, we see the shoe that contains the last of plant life. It grows into a mighty tree. A tree that strikingly resembles the central tree in A Bugâs Life.



Thatâs right. The reason no humans show up in A Bugâs Life is because there arenât a lot left. We know because of the cockroach that some of the insects survived, meaning they would have rebounded a bit faster, though the movie had to be far enough in the timeline for birds to have returned as well, though they’re noticeably less intelligent than the bugs.
[I’ll admit, the trees looking similar isn’t enough to support the idea that A Bug’s Life takes place after Wall-E, but there’s definitely more reasons for why it’s likely. Also, I’ll bring the tree up again later because it appears in Up as well.]
Thereâs something strikingly different about A Bugâs Life when compared to other Pixar portrayals of animals, which leads me to believe it takes place in the future. Unlike Ratatouille, Up, and Finding Nemo, the bugs have many human activities similar to what the rats in Ratatouille were merely experimenting with.
The bugs have cities, bars, advertisements, their own machines, know what a bloody mary is and even have a traveling circus. This all assumes that the movie is in a different time period.
The other factor that sets A Bugâs Life apart from other Pixar movies is the fact that it is the only one, besides Cars and Cars 2, that doesnât revolve (or even include) humans.

[Okay there is a a lot of contention over the idea that A Bug’s Life takes place post-apocalypse, but hear me out. The reason I am so inclined to push the idea is because of how different the bug world is from the “animal” movies. No other Pixar movie has animals wearing clothing, wild inventions, animals creating machines, or so much human influence like bars and cities.]
[In Finding Nemo, the most human thing we see is a school, and even that is pretty stripped down. But in A Bug’s Life, we have a world where humans are barely even implied. At one point, one of the ants tells Flik not to leave the island because there are “snakes, birds, and bigger bugs out there.” He doesn’t even bring up humans.
[Yes, there are some humans, like the kid who allegedly picked the wings off of the homeless bug, but that still fits in a post Wall-E world. Also, the bugs have to be irradiated for them to live such long lifespans. The average lifespan of an ant is just 3 months, but these ants all survive an entire summer and allude to being around for quite some time by saying things like “this happens every year.” One of the ants even says he “feels 90 again.” That works if you accept that the ants are sturdier due to evolution and mutated genes.]
Thereâs another Pixar movie that was supposed to be released in 2012, but it was cancelled and replaced with Brave. This movie was called Newt, and I believe it might have fit in this part of the timeline post-Wall-E. The movieâs supposed plot: âWhat happens when the last remaining male and female blue-footed newts on the planet are forced together by science to save the species, and they canât stand each other?âÂ

A movie about an endangered species rebuilding itself could lend itself nicely to this theory, but since the movie was never released, Iâm just speculating.
So what happens next? Humanity, machines, and animals grow in harmony to the point where a new super species is born. Monsters. The monsters civilization is actually Earth in the incredibly distant future.
[Someone wisely pointed out that in Monsters University, the college is said to be founded in 1313. If we’re really in the future, then that means the monsters could have reset society and begun using their own calendar. That could mean Monsters Inc. takes place up to 1400 (or more) years after A Bug’s Life.]
Where did they come from? Itâs possible that the monsters are simply the personified animals mutated after the diseased earth was irradiated for 800 years.
[Not during Wall-E. I would guess that it took hundreds of years after Wall-E for the animals to become monsters]

Whatever the reason, these monsters seem to all look like horribly mutated animals, only larger and civilized. They have cities and even colleges, as we see in Monsters University.
[An issue some have found is that this doesn’t properly explain what happened to humans. I haven’t settled on a theory I really like yet, but I’m leaning towards the idea that monsters and machines eventually forgot that they need humans and got rid of them again, not realizing their mistake until all humans died out. Another explanation is that humans just couldn’t survive on Earth anymore.]
In Monsters Inc., they have an energy crisis because they are in a future earth without humans. Humans are the source of energy, but thanks to the machines, again, the Monsters find a way to use doors to travel to the human world. Only, itâs not different dimensions.

The monsters are going back in time. Theyâre harvesting energy to keep from becoming extinct by going back to when humans were most prominent. The peak of civilization, if you will. Though a lot of time has passed, animosity towards humans never really went away for animals/monsters.
Monsters must have relied on anti-human instincts to believe that just touching a human would corrupt their world like it did in the past. So they scare humans to gather their energy until they realize that laughter (green energy) is more efficient because it is positive in nature.
[An alternative explanation that fits even better that some of you brought up: The machines and monsters created the time travel doors but realized that messing with time could erase their existence and change history. So, they falsely trained monsters to believe that humans are toxic and from another dimension, making it suicide for a monster to interact too much with their world.]
[Another issue is how the monsters seem to worry about kids “being less scared these days.” It’s likely that going in the past takes a lot of energy, so the monsters can only go back as far as the practice still returns a profit in energy. To them, they’re just moving through the same dimension of time, but the monsters at the top know that eventually, they’ll run out. This is why Waternose is so bent on capturing children and enslaving them.]
We even see a connection between A Bugâs Life and Monsters Inc. via the trailer we see in both movies. As you can see, the trailer looks exactly the same, except the one in A Bugâs Life is noticeably older and more decrepit, while the one in Monsters Inc. (where Randall is sent via a door) has humans and looks newer.

Look at the picture above. On the left is the trailer from A Bugâs Life and the one on the right is from Monsters Inc. The one on the left looks older and more rundown. Even the vegetation is noticeably dryer and thereâs less of it. The trailer on the right has humans and the frame even includes tall grass and a tree hanging overhead.
[Some have argued that the trailer in A Bug’s Life should be nothing but dust. I disagree based on how barely intact other buildings were in Wall-E. They also bring up the bug zapper that is powered by electricity. The zapper could easily be solar powered, just like Wall-E. The bugs probably used it as a light source to signal other bugs to “Bug City.” Also, the trailer in A Bug’s Life never shows lights in the trailer like it does for Monsters Inc.]
That said, Monsters Inc. is so far the most futuristic Pixar movie. By the end, humans, animals, and machines have finally found a way to understand each other and live harmoniously.
And then thereâs Boo. What do you think happened to her? She saw everything take place in future earth where âkittyâ was able to talk. She became obsessed with finding out what happened to her friend Sully and why animals in her time werenât quite as smart as the ones sheâd seen in the future.
She remembers that âdoorsâ are the key to how she found Sully in the first place and becomesâŠ

A WITCH. Yes, Boo is the witch from Brave. She figures out how to travel in time to find Sully, and goes back to what she believes is the source: The will-of-the-wisps.
They are what started everything, and as a witch, she cultivates this magic in an attempt to find Sully by creating doors going backwards and forwards in time.
[Just to clarify: The theory is that Boo discovered a way to use doors to travel through time on her own, possibly by developing magic on her own. She probably went back in time to the Dark Ages to get more magic from the will-o-wisps.]
How do we know? In Brave, you can briefly see a drawing in the workshop. Itâs Sully.

We even see the Pizza Planet truck carved as a wooden toy in her shop, which makes no sense unless sheâs seen one beforeâŠ(and Iâm sure she has since that truck is in almost every Pixar movie). If you look closely, you can see the carved truck below.
You remember Merida opening doors and the witch constantly disappearing? Itâs because those doors are made the same way from Monsters Inc. They transport across time and that is why Merida couldnât find the witch later in the movie.
[A lot of people have brought up how easter eggs are scattered throughout all the Pixar movies. I barely scratch the surface, but a great theory offered by some that I support is that these easter eggs are planted by Boo either intentionally or accidentally as she travels through time to find Sully. Some support for that is the fact that every easter egg in Brave lies in her workshop.]
But wait. How did Boo travel in time in the first place, and why is she obsessed with wood? Boo must have discovered that wood has been the source of energy all along, not just humans. The machines and monsters in Monsters Inc. use doors because theyâre made of wood and found a way to use that energy to travel in time.
[Many have pointed out how the door that banishes monsters is metal. That’s probably because wood is used to harness this magic, and using a metal door would stop a banished monster from going back through it.]
Obsessed with finding Sully, Boo travelled across the Pixar universe using doors.
[It’s even possible that the wood from the tree in A Bug’s Life is the source of Flik’s ingenuity, due to his fascination and respect for seeds growing into trees. The tree also bears a resemblance to the one in Up that Carl and Ellie frequented, which could be the source of Carl’s wild creativity in using balloons to transport his house.]
[This also explains why Flik and Heimlich from A Bug’s Life show up in Toy Story 2, which would be centuries before their time. Boo was trying to go to the future and could have fallen short by landing in the post-Wall-E time. She would need wood to keep time traveling, but there’s not much around yet, so she stumbles upon the tree in A Bug’s Life. She could have accidentally brought back a few bugs with her when traveling backwards in time.]
So Boo went back to the Dark Ages, probably because she could use plenty of wood there for her experiments or to study the will-o-wisps. We know that her first encounter with Morâdu ended with her turning him into a monstrous bear, but he regresses.
She probably wanted to turn him into a bear because Sully resembles a bear, and she is still trying to figure out where Sully comes from.
Does Boo ever find Sully? I like to think so. He surely reunited with her at least once as a child at the end of Monsters Inc., but eventually, he had to stop visiting.
But her love for Sully is, after all, the crux of the entire Pixar universe. The love of different people of different ages and even different species finding ways to live on Earth without destroying it because of a lust for energy.
And that is the Pixar Theory.
For Inside Out, The Good Dinosaur, and Finding Dory, the story continues in Parts 2,3, and 4  respectively, so here are some other helpful links for your reading pleasure:
- The Pixar Theory – What about Planes?
- The Pixar Detective – an expanded universe novel that explains the theory as a full narrative.
Thanks for reading this. Be sure to say hey on Twitter: @JonNegroni
All images courtesy of Disney/Pixar


If BnG has been taken the world by the time of Toy Story, why not put them making the toys itself? This would explain about the toys showing signs of AI and anti-human biases.
How bout despicable me 1 and 2?
Are you serious? Those aren’t Pixar, they are Dreamworks.
WRONG! They’re Universal!
In fact, the first Despicable Me film was the RIVAL film of Dreamworks’ Megamind(which I think was a superior film, but I love both)!
Those aren’t pixar movies.
Despicable Me 1& 2 are under DreamWorks
It is not Pixar. film, it is a Universal Studios film.
That’s illunimation entertainment, not pixar.
In the Toy Story 2 ‘outtakes’ we see the A Bug’s Life characters hanging out on a leaf while Buzz Lightyear chops his way through the hedges.
Boo is in Toy Story 3 as a toddler in the day care. This is not only via the assumptions of fans who thought the girl looks familiar, but “word of god” in the commentary and in talks about the Easter Eggs in the film.
My Thoughts:
I really liked your theory, but I have some remarks.
1. I’ve thought a little bit about why humans disappeared after Wall-E/A Bugs Life. I think that they may well have died because of radiation. When the Cars were suffering from the lack of energy, they may well have researched nuclear technology. That’s what nuked almost all life from the planet – and why insects survived. After the Wall-E events, humans have tried to rebuild society but they failed BECAUSE of radiation. And that same sort of fallout accelerated evolution even more, creating the monsters. They have created their society, and then your theory can continue…
2. Why there were an energy crisis in Monsters, Inc.? Because time travel must be linear. They seriously suggest that more violent “media” made the kids less vulnerable – and that’s where I think there’s a huge flaw in your theory: why would Boo be able to travel in non-linear time? That’s a big discussion topic.
3. There’s a dinosaur-like enormous monster in Monsters, Inc.. That’s a fun point to speculate on.
4. I’ve heard about a Pixar movie about the great SF earthquake. That’s another speculation point.
Well, that’s my thoughts, I’d be glad if you could give it a glimpse.
Thanks!
Brilliant. It took me two days to read through it all (I have a baby cakes to chase) but it was very worth it! Bravo on such a wonderful theory that makes perfect sense! Would it totally blow your mind if this is in fact what Pixar intended? And if so, I have a new found respect for them for being able to create such an intricate and beautiful story within a story. Loved it, thank you!
that would make the pixar’s movies the most complex movie series ever developed.
I don’t know about making perfect sense (at all), but Pixar always have been one of the most thoughtful, whimsical studio I have ever seen. I absolutely love them! With or without a grand scheme like this, they are brilliant.
I wonder if you can come up with a good explination as to why Jesse was in monsters inc here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZ7xLv4_kzg (2:48)
Just a minor clarification. If Wall-E is robot Jesus, then his love interest is not “aptly” named Eve. Wall-E would have to be robot Adam for Eve to be aptly named. Robot Adam, Noah, or Jesus are all a bit of a stretch, anyway, since he didn’t start the human race, build the ark, or sacrifice himself to save humanity,
Don’t really have anything to add. You’ve obviously put a lot of thought into this. Pretty epic. Makes me wanna some Pixar films. Anyways, thanks for your philosophical genius, made my day đ
I would like to add to your theory. In Monsters Inc, when you see a line of doors you also see a TARDIS door. For those of you who are unaware, the TARDIS is the machine in Doctor Who that can travel all of space and time. Because of seeing this in Monsters Inc I automatically assumed they were going back in time. If Boo managed to get a hold of one of these door and if it acted like the TARDIS she would be able to create herself as mobily fixed, making yourself a fixed point in time via time travel. There are some points in time that are fixed but others that can be changed, which explains Boo.
Loved every minute reading this!
Something bugs me though, at the Allinol part. It just doesn’t fit right into the “Machines hate humans but can’t get rid of them because humans are their source of energy.”
Hear me out; if the machines really hate humans that much, isn’t the logical way of their thinking is to get rid of their dependency on humans altogether?
The way I see it, by going into the advancement of Bio-Fuels, the machines (Cars):
— don’t have to rely on human-extracted Petrol anymore (I’m
assuming that petrol still comes from humans at this point of
technology. The reason why will be touched on later), and
— at the same time, they can prevent the impending doom caused
by the accumulation of pollution as a by-product of petrol
combustion that is the global warming.
So by going this way, the machines are getting rid of their dependency on humans. But this doesn’t fit into Allinol’s motives. in Cars 2, It seems like its sole purpose is to get the Cars to move away from the advancement of the Bio-Fuels.
But if, like you proposed, Allinol and Buy-N-Large are in fact just interchangeable names of the same organization in favour of the advancement of the machines, why would Allinol want to create the uprise against the use of Bio-Fuels (while in fact the Bio-Fuels are actually key to saving themselves) in the first place? Isn’t the purpose of Allinol/BNL to advance the civilization of machines?
Of course, one could argue that two possible explanations can fit into this model, that is either:
1. Allinol’s sole purpose has been to promote the use of the Bio-Fuels in the first place, but since they realise that the transition towards Bio-Fuels could be difficult (disruptive technology advancement), they created this plan to have somebody pick up a role of the smear-campaign against it, and then have somebody else pick up a role of a “hero,” who will eventually “defeat” the political “villain” (in this case Sir Miles Axlerod) thus turning public opinion into trusting the benefits of Bio-Fuels. This would mean that Finn McMissile is actually a part of this conspiracy after all (or he could just be unaware of all this entirely because he’s only a foot soldier). Or…
2. There has grown a bit of an argument inside Allinol/BNL, and the people are divided into two factions. One faction actually is Pro-Independency on humans and thus promotes the advancement of Bio-Fuels. The other faction, like the toys in Toy Story and robots in Wall-E, actually believes that Machines and Humans, despite popular belief among the machines, can coexist and live together peacefully. This faction then, promotes the use of the Petrol. This is where the humans come in, because, as I explained earlier, the humans are the ones extracting and producing all the petrol for the machines. By going with this model, the machines and humans can actually coexist and benefit from each other, and global warming wouldnât be a problem since the advancement of science and technology coming from the combination of contribution from both sides will eventually come up with a solution for global warming in a faster pace. These two factions thus clash with each other, and from then anything could happen. Perhaps the explanation for the seemingly self-contradictory existence of Allinol is because it is the product of the clash of the two factions, causing the machines to separate into two opposing groups, âAllinolâ that is actually pro-humans and âBNLâ that is anti-humans. From that point on, a secret political war ensues between these two factions. Note the difference in the possible meaning of these two names: âAllinolâ sounds like it promotes the coexistence of âallâ race, namely the machine and the human, while âBuy-N-Largeâ sounds more like it promotes the âgrowthâ and âexpansionâ of the machine race. Also, this âpro or anti humanâ conflict seems to have been the focus of Toy Story and Wall-E already, with Cars filling in as a possible explanation.
I know that these are just a few of many possible explanations, but the way I see it, these are the two most plausible ones, and even the latter seems to be taking it too far and seems a bit of a long shot, therefore leaving the former the preferable and more likely explanation. But that is only assuming that this whole âPixar Theoryâ is real.
But screw my explanations, I want to know what YOUR explanation about Allinolâs self-contradictory existence!
Anyways, this whole piece is BLOODY BRILLIANT, and you have instantly made me both a fan and a believer. Regardless of where this is going, EFFING FANTASTIC JOB mate.
the human brain is hard wired to invent associations and connections where there is none. it was used here for entertainment instead of for conspiracy theories which are bad. nice article
all events have happened somewhere according to multidimensional theory. Therefore, this theory is correct even if it is not in this Dimension.
Awesome theory! Being a hardcore Pixar fan, I promise that I’ll do my best to somehow contribute to this theory. Here’s one: just some inconsistency regarding A Bug’s Life:
In one of the bloopers at the end of Toy Story (2 I think), some characters of A Bug’s Life appeared in a plant when Buzz passed through. So yeah, that means A Bug’s life can’t be post-apocalyptic.
As my man Carl Sagan always said “extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence”.
I noticed in one of maters tall tales he meets a UFO that thinks for itself this could help the theory aswell as the Easter egg A113
Jon,
This article was very delightful, creative and purposed. I thoroughly enjoyed it!
One nagging thought tickles my brain regarding the Monster’s Inc. doors. During the Monster’s Inc commercial, they show a simulation of a child calloused and unaffected due to the influence of television. The Voice Over says that “The window of innocence is shrinking- human kids..[bored child plops into cereal].. are harder to scare.” Mr Waternoose says that M. I is ‘prepared for the future’.
This implies that Monster’s don’t have control or choice over time, and that the humans flow of time is directly related to the Monster’s flow of time.
If the doors they used were for time travel, why would this even be a concern? Wouldn’t they use time travel to scare children in a more innocent time? They could even cheat the system, and scare the same children again and again- for the first time, technically.
Also, I see the Brave witch directly related to the Monster world- not indirectly, like Boo. It seems more likely that the witch was a previous scare-er, born and raised in the Monster world (it would possibly coincide with the ‘interbreeding’ theory. I agree. Gross.). Maybe she was a spurned lover of Sully’s? Too much speculation about the witch at this point, though.
I feel as though your Pixar Theory is not-quite-there-for-me yet. You’re very close, though. Like- medium rare close.
Anyway, it got me thinking and got me geeking. Great read. Great writing. Good luck.
Sooo, basically Boo is the Doctor.
yeh haha i thought that
You could easily work Brave Little Toaster in here…
Theorizing that the various Dinoco logos, found in Toy Story (seen here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGc894z7IPg) and played a big role in Cars 2, will relate to Pixars upcoming “The Good Dinosaur”. Logos are very similar.
Could the baby from the Incredibles possibly be one of the monsters from monsters inc, or is the reason why monsters are in the future?
Any ideas on this?
In Ratatoullie, Colette is reading the restaurant review in the paper. In the headline you can clearly see Bomb Voyage’s name. Also when Linguini is trying to find a hiding spot for Remy wearing what looks like Incredibles underwear. And Bomb Voyage makes a scene as a mime. A113 is used as a tag on Remy’s brother’s ear. Dug’s shadow also makes an appearance. The number also appears in Up and Toy Story. The robots in Wall E seem to be using the same zero point energy invented by Syndrome.
I’m coming to this discussion today, one of my friends pointed it out to me. I’m sure this has been discussed before, but since Boo appears in the daycare in Toy Story 3, AND since she appears to be Jessie’s owner in Monsters Inc., could it be that she is the original source of the toys from Toy Story’s sentience?