
Every Pixar movie is connected. I explain how, and possibly why.
In 2012, I watched a video on Cracked.com that introduced the idea (at least to me) that all of the Pixar movies actually exist within the same universe. Since then, I’ve obsessed over this concept, working to complete what I call The Pixar Theory, a working narrative that ties all of the Pixar movies into one cohesive timeline with a main theme. Another, longer, title is “The Grand Unifying Theory of Pixar Movies.”
This theory covers every feature-length movie made by Pixar Animation Studios since 1995. They include:
- Toy Story
- A Bug’s Life
- Toy Story 2
- Monsters Inc.
- Finding Nemo
- The Incredibles
- Cars
- Ratatouille
- Wall-E
- Up
- Toy Story 3
- Cars 2
- Brave
- Monsters University
- Inside Out (in Part 2)
- The Good Dinosaur (in Part 3)
- Finding Dory (in Part 4)
- Cars 3, Coco, Incredibles 2, and Toy Story 4 will be included in the upcoming book
The point of this theory is to have fun and exercise your imagination while simultaneously finding interesting connections between these fantastic movies. The trick is not take any of it too seriously. If you would like to experience a shorter version of this theory, check out the visualized Pixar Theory Timeline.
In fact, I highly suggest you watch this video I made with Screen Junkies/Fandom below. It more thoroughly lays out this theory and its most complex ideas. It’s also a far more “current” version of the theory compared to the rest of this post. Plus, it has more movies included! Enjoy.
The original Pixar Theory:
As of this writing in 2013, Brave is the first and last movie in the timeline. Obviously, this movie about a Scottish kingdom during the Dark Ages is the earliest time period covered by the Pixar films, but it’s also the only Pixar movie that actually explains why animals in the Pixar universe behave like humans sometimes.

In Brave, Merida discovers that there is “magic” that can solve her problems but inadvertently turns her mother into a bear. We find out that this magic comes from an odd witch seemingly connected to the mysterious will-of-the-wisps. Not only do we see animals behaving like humans, but we also see brooms (inanimate objects) behaving like people in the witch’s shop.
We also learn that this witch inexplicably disappears every time she passes through doors, leading us to believe that she may not even exist. Don’t get ahead of me, but we’ll come back to Brave. Let’s just say that for now, the witch is someone we know from a different movie in the timeline.

[Some of you have pointed out that the animals in Brave gradually regress back into an animal state, disproving the idea that this is the source of animals acting like humans. My rebuttal is simple. They regress because the magic wears off. Over time, their evolving intelligence grows naturally.]
Centuries later, the animals from Brave that have been experimented on by the witch have interbred, creating a large-scale population of animals slowly gaining personification and intelligence on their own.
There are two progressions: the progression of the animals and the progression of artificial intelligence. The events of the following movies set up a power struggle between humans, animals, and machines.
The stage for all-out war in regards to animals is set by Ratatouille, Finding Nemo, and Up, in that order. Notice I left out A Bug’s Life, but I’ll explain why later.
In Ratatouille, we see animals experimenting with their growing personification in small, controlled experiments.

Remy wants to cook, which is something only humans explicitly do. He crafts a relationship with a small group of humans and finds success. Meanwhile, the villain of Ratatouille, Chef Skinner, disappears. What happened to him? What did he do with his newfound knowledge that animals were capable of transcending their instincts and performing duties better than humans?
It’s possible that Charles Muntz, the antagonist of Up, learned of this startling rumor, giving him the idea to begin inventing devices that would harness the thoughts of animals, namely his dogs, through translator collars. Those collars indicated to Muntz that animals are smarter and more like humans than we think. He needed this technology to find the exotic bird he’s obsessed over, and he even comments on how many dogs he’s lost since he arrived in South America.

But then Dug and the rest of his experiments are set free after Muntz’s demise, and we don’t know the full implications of that, but what we do know is that animosity between the animals and humans is growing steadily. Now that humans have discovered the potential of animals, they are beginning to cross the line. To develop this new technology, the humans begin an industrial revolution hinted at in Up.
[Some have pointed out that Muntz was working in South America before the events of Ratatouille. This is true, but it is not explicitly stated how and when he developed the collars. Also, we know Ratatouille takes place before Up for several reasons. In Toy Story 3, a postcard on Andy’s wall has Carl and Ellie’s name and address on it (including their last names to confirm). This confirms that in 2010, the time of Toy Story 3, Ellie is still alive or hasn’t been dead long. This supports the idea that Up takes place years later.]

In the beginning of Up, Carl is forced to give up his house to a corporation because they are expanding the city.
Wait a second. What corporation is guilty for polluting the earth and wiping out life in the distant future because of technological overreach?

Buy-n-Large (BNL), a corporation that runs just about everything by the time we get to Wall-E. In the“History of BNL” commercial from the movie, we’re told that BNL has even taken over the world governments. Did you catch that this one corporation achieved global dominance? Interestingly, this is the same organization alluded to in Toy Story 3:

In Finding Nemo, we have an entire population of sea creatures uniting to save a fish that was captured by humans. BNL shows up again in this universe via another news article that talks about a beautiful underwater world.
Lines are being crossed. Humans are beginning to antagonize the increasingly networked and intelligent animals.
Think about Dory from Finding Nemo for a second. She stands apart from most of the other fish. Why? She isn’t as intelligent. Her short-term memory loss is likely a result of her not being as advanced as the other sea creatures, which is a reasonable explanation for how rapidly these creatures are evolving.

It’s likely that the sequel to Finding Nemo, which is about Dory, will touch on this and further explain why. We may also get some more evidence pointing to animosity between humans and animals.
[Some great users have pointed out that Dory is actually more intelligent and shows signs of growth due to her ability to read and communicate with whales. This would actually show signs of how the animals are beginning to change in intelligence gradually.]
And that is the furthest movie in the “animal” side of things. When it comes to A.I., we start with The Incredibles. Who is the main villain of this movie? You probably thought of Buddy, a.ka. Syndrome, who basically commits genocide on super-powered humans.

Or does he? Buddy didn’t have any powers. He used technology to enact revenge on Mr. Incredible for not taking him seriously. Seems a little odd that the man went so far as to commit genocide.
[A lot of people have been arguing about where The Incredibles actually takes place because we see technology from modern times and the 1980s even though everything has a 1960s vibe. This is cleared by Brad Bird, the director, who says the movie takes place in an alternate 1960s, which means the movie opens in the 1950s.]
And how does he kill all of the supers? He creates the omnidroid, an A.I. “killbot” that learns the moves of every super-human and adapts. When Mr. Incredible is first told about this machine, Mirage mentions that it is an advanced artificial intelligence that has gone rogue.
Mr. Incredible points out that it got smart enough to wonder why it had to take orders. The omnidroid eventually turns on Syndrome, and starts attacking humans in the city. Why would an A.I. want to just attack randomly? Do machines have an inherent hatred of humans?
The movie even shows clips of the superheroes with capes being done in by inanimate objects, such as plane turbines…accidentally.


But why would machines want to get rid of humans in the first place? We know that animals don’t like humans because they are polluting the Earth and experimenting on them, but why would the machines have an issue?
Enter Toy Story. Here we see humans using and discarding “objects” that are clearly sentient. Yes, the toys love it Uncle Tom style, but over the course of the Toy Story sequels, we see toys becoming fed up. But wait, toys and inanimate objects aren’t necessarily machines, so how do they have some kind of intelligence?
Syndrome points to the answer. He tells Mr. Incredible that his lasers are powered by Zero Point Energy. This is the electromagnetic energy that exists in a vacuum. It’s the unseen energy we find in wavelengths and a reasonable explanation for how toys and objects in the Pixar world draw power.

By the events of the Toy Story movies, we are in the 90s until 2010. It’s been 40-50 years or so since the events of The Incredibles, giving A.I. plenty of time to develop BNL.
Meanwhile, Pixar is hinting at dissatisfaction among pockets of toy civilizations. The toys rise up against Sid in the first movie. Jesse resents her owner, Emily, for abandoning her. Lotso Huggin’ Bear straight up hates humans by the third movie.
Toys are obviously not satisfied with the status quo, providing a reason for why machines and objects alike are ready to take over.
So, by the 2000s, the super-humans are all but gone, and mankind is vulnerable. Animals, who want to rise up Planet of the Apes style, have the ability to take over, but we don’t see this happen.
Also, A.I. never takes over humans by force. Why do you think that is? It’s reasonable to assume that machines did take over, just not as we expected. The machines used BNL, a faceless corporation (which are basically faceless in nature) to dominate the world, starting in the 1960s after the Omnidroid fails to defeat the Incredibles.
In each of the Toy Story movies, it’s made painfully clear that sentient objects rely on humans for everything. For fulfillment and even energy. It’s hinted at that the Toys lose all life when put away in “storage” unless they are in a museum that will get them seen by humans.

So machines decide to control humans by using a corporation that suits their every need, leading to an industrial revolution that eventually leads to…pollution. When the animals rise up against the humans to stop them from polluting the earth, who will save them? The machines.
We know that the machines will win the war, too, because after this war, there are almost no animals left on Earth. Who’s left?

Because the machines tip everything out of balance, Earth becomes an unfit planet for humans and animals, so the remaining humans are put on Axiom (or Noah’s Ark if you want to carry on the Biblical theme where Wall-E is basically Robot Jesus and his love interest is aptly named Eve) as a last-ditch effort to save the human race.

On Axiom, the humans have no purpose aside from having their needs met by the machines. The machines have made humans dependent on them for everything because that is how they were treated as “toys.” It’s all they know.

Meanwhile on Earth, machines are left behind to populate the world and run things, explaining human landmarks and traditions still being prominent in Cars. There are no animals or humans in this version of Earth because they’re all gone, but we do know that the planet still has many human influences left.
[Some have noted that the world of Cars can’t be after humans left because there’s no pollution shown in the movies. If you look carefully at Wall-E, however, the world is never shown during this time, so we don’t really know how badly the Earth was polluted.]
[It’s possible that the machines sent humans away to curb overpopulation and fix the environment without them, but the world was drained of resources as a result of machines populating the Earth. That would explain why the machines abandoned Earth entirely, leaving only Wall-E behind.]
In Cars 2, the cars go to Europe and Japan, making it plain that this is all taking place on Earth as we know it. So what happened to the cars? We’ve learned by now that humans are the source of energy for the machines. That’s why they never got rid of them.
In Wall-E, they point out that BNL intended to bring the humans back once the planet was clean again, but they failed. The machines on Earth eventually died out, though we don’t know how.

What we do know is that there is an energy crisis in Cars 2, with oil being the only way society trudges on despite its dangers. We even learn that the Allinol corporation was using “green energy” as a catalyst for a fuel war in order to turn cars away from alternative energy sources. That “clean” fuel could have been used to wipe out many of the cars, very quickly.

[Someone pointed out that “all in all” means the same thing as “by and large” making the connection between Cars and Wall-E even more substantial.]
Which brings us back to Wall-E. Have you ever wondered why Wall-E was the only machine left? We know that the movie begins 800 years after humans have left Earth on Axiom, governed by the AutoPilot (another A.I. reference).
Could it be that Wall-E’s fascination with human culture and friendship with a cockroach is what allowed him to keep finding fulfillment and the ability to maintain his personality? That’s why he was special and liberated the humans.
He remembered the times when humans and machines lived in peace, away from all of the pollution caused by both sides.

After Wall-E liberates the humans and they rebuild society back on Earth, what happens then? During the end credits of Wall-E, we see the shoe that contains the last of plant life. It grows into a mighty tree. A tree that strikingly resembles the central tree in A Bug’s Life.



That’s right. The reason no humans show up in A Bug’s Life is because there aren’t a lot left. We know because of the cockroach that some of the insects survived, meaning they would have rebounded a bit faster, though the movie had to be far enough in the timeline for birds to have returned as well, though they’re noticeably less intelligent than the bugs.
[I’ll admit, the trees looking similar isn’t enough to support the idea that A Bug’s Life takes place after Wall-E, but there’s definitely more reasons for why it’s likely. Also, I’ll bring the tree up again later because it appears in Up as well.]
There’s something strikingly different about A Bug’s Life when compared to other Pixar portrayals of animals, which leads me to believe it takes place in the future. Unlike Ratatouille, Up, and Finding Nemo, the bugs have many human activities similar to what the rats in Ratatouille were merely experimenting with.
The bugs have cities, bars, advertisements, their own machines, know what a bloody mary is and even have a traveling circus. This all assumes that the movie is in a different time period.
The other factor that sets A Bug’s Life apart from other Pixar movies is the fact that it is the only one, besides Cars and Cars 2, that doesn’t revolve (or even include) humans.

[Okay there is a a lot of contention over the idea that A Bug’s Life takes place post-apocalypse, but hear me out. The reason I am so inclined to push the idea is because of how different the bug world is from the “animal” movies. No other Pixar movie has animals wearing clothing, wild inventions, animals creating machines, or so much human influence like bars and cities.]
[In Finding Nemo, the most human thing we see is a school, and even that is pretty stripped down. But in A Bug’s Life, we have a world where humans are barely even implied. At one point, one of the ants tells Flik not to leave the island because there are “snakes, birds, and bigger bugs out there.” He doesn’t even bring up humans.
[Yes, there are some humans, like the kid who allegedly picked the wings off of the homeless bug, but that still fits in a post Wall-E world. Also, the bugs have to be irradiated for them to live such long lifespans. The average lifespan of an ant is just 3 months, but these ants all survive an entire summer and allude to being around for quite some time by saying things like “this happens every year.” One of the ants even says he “feels 90 again.” That works if you accept that the ants are sturdier due to evolution and mutated genes.]
There’s another Pixar movie that was supposed to be released in 2012, but it was cancelled and replaced with Brave. This movie was called Newt, and I believe it might have fit in this part of the timeline post-Wall-E. The movie’s supposed plot: “What happens when the last remaining male and female blue-footed newts on the planet are forced together by science to save the species, and they can’t stand each other?”

A movie about an endangered species rebuilding itself could lend itself nicely to this theory, but since the movie was never released, I’m just speculating.
So what happens next? Humanity, machines, and animals grow in harmony to the point where a new super species is born. Monsters. The monsters civilization is actually Earth in the incredibly distant future.
[Someone wisely pointed out that in Monsters University, the college is said to be founded in 1313. If we’re really in the future, then that means the monsters could have reset society and begun using their own calendar. That could mean Monsters Inc. takes place up to 1400 (or more) years after A Bug’s Life.]
Where did they come from? It’s possible that the monsters are simply the personified animals mutated after the diseased earth was irradiated for 800 years.
[Not during Wall-E. I would guess that it took hundreds of years after Wall-E for the animals to become monsters]

Whatever the reason, these monsters seem to all look like horribly mutated animals, only larger and civilized. They have cities and even colleges, as we see in Monsters University.
[An issue some have found is that this doesn’t properly explain what happened to humans. I haven’t settled on a theory I really like yet, but I’m leaning towards the idea that monsters and machines eventually forgot that they need humans and got rid of them again, not realizing their mistake until all humans died out. Another explanation is that humans just couldn’t survive on Earth anymore.]
In Monsters Inc., they have an energy crisis because they are in a future earth without humans. Humans are the source of energy, but thanks to the machines, again, the Monsters find a way to use doors to travel to the human world. Only, it’s not different dimensions.

The monsters are going back in time. They’re harvesting energy to keep from becoming extinct by going back to when humans were most prominent. The peak of civilization, if you will. Though a lot of time has passed, animosity towards humans never really went away for animals/monsters.
Monsters must have relied on anti-human instincts to believe that just touching a human would corrupt their world like it did in the past. So they scare humans to gather their energy until they realize that laughter (green energy) is more efficient because it is positive in nature.
[An alternative explanation that fits even better that some of you brought up: The machines and monsters created the time travel doors but realized that messing with time could erase their existence and change history. So, they falsely trained monsters to believe that humans are toxic and from another dimension, making it suicide for a monster to interact too much with their world.]
[Another issue is how the monsters seem to worry about kids “being less scared these days.” It’s likely that going in the past takes a lot of energy, so the monsters can only go back as far as the practice still returns a profit in energy. To them, they’re just moving through the same dimension of time, but the monsters at the top know that eventually, they’ll run out. This is why Waternose is so bent on capturing children and enslaving them.]
We even see a connection between A Bug’s Life and Monsters Inc. via the trailer we see in both movies. As you can see, the trailer looks exactly the same, except the one in A Bug’s Life is noticeably older and more decrepit, while the one in Monsters Inc. (where Randall is sent via a door) has humans and looks newer.

Look at the picture above. On the left is the trailer from A Bug’s Life and the one on the right is from Monsters Inc. The one on the left looks older and more rundown. Even the vegetation is noticeably dryer and there’s less of it. The trailer on the right has humans and the frame even includes tall grass and a tree hanging overhead.
[Some have argued that the trailer in A Bug’s Life should be nothing but dust. I disagree based on how barely intact other buildings were in Wall-E. They also bring up the bug zapper that is powered by electricity. The zapper could easily be solar powered, just like Wall-E. The bugs probably used it as a light source to signal other bugs to “Bug City.” Also, the trailer in A Bug’s Life never shows lights in the trailer like it does for Monsters Inc.]
That said, Monsters Inc. is so far the most futuristic Pixar movie. By the end, humans, animals, and machines have finally found a way to understand each other and live harmoniously.
And then there’s Boo. What do you think happened to her? She saw everything take place in future earth where “kitty” was able to talk. She became obsessed with finding out what happened to her friend Sully and why animals in her time weren’t quite as smart as the ones she’d seen in the future.
She remembers that “doors” are the key to how she found Sully in the first place and becomes…

A WITCH. Yes, Boo is the witch from Brave. She figures out how to travel in time to find Sully, and goes back to what she believes is the source: The will-of-the-wisps.
They are what started everything, and as a witch, she cultivates this magic in an attempt to find Sully by creating doors going backwards and forwards in time.
[Just to clarify: The theory is that Boo discovered a way to use doors to travel through time on her own, possibly by developing magic on her own. She probably went back in time to the Dark Ages to get more magic from the will-o-wisps.]
How do we know? In Brave, you can briefly see a drawing in the workshop. It’s Sully.

We even see the Pizza Planet truck carved as a wooden toy in her shop, which makes no sense unless she’s seen one before…(and I’m sure she has since that truck is in almost every Pixar movie). If you look closely, you can see the carved truck below.
You remember Merida opening doors and the witch constantly disappearing? It’s because those doors are made the same way from Monsters Inc. They transport across time and that is why Merida couldn’t find the witch later in the movie.
[A lot of people have brought up how easter eggs are scattered throughout all the Pixar movies. I barely scratch the surface, but a great theory offered by some that I support is that these easter eggs are planted by Boo either intentionally or accidentally as she travels through time to find Sully. Some support for that is the fact that every easter egg in Brave lies in her workshop.]
But wait. How did Boo travel in time in the first place, and why is she obsessed with wood? Boo must have discovered that wood has been the source of energy all along, not just humans. The machines and monsters in Monsters Inc. use doors because they’re made of wood and found a way to use that energy to travel in time.
[Many have pointed out how the door that banishes monsters is metal. That’s probably because wood is used to harness this magic, and using a metal door would stop a banished monster from going back through it.]
Obsessed with finding Sully, Boo travelled across the Pixar universe using doors.
[It’s even possible that the wood from the tree in A Bug’s Life is the source of Flik’s ingenuity, due to his fascination and respect for seeds growing into trees. The tree also bears a resemblance to the one in Up that Carl and Ellie frequented, which could be the source of Carl’s wild creativity in using balloons to transport his house.]
[This also explains why Flik and Heimlich from A Bug’s Life show up in Toy Story 2, which would be centuries before their time. Boo was trying to go to the future and could have fallen short by landing in the post-Wall-E time. She would need wood to keep time traveling, but there’s not much around yet, so she stumbles upon the tree in A Bug’s Life. She could have accidentally brought back a few bugs with her when traveling backwards in time.]
So Boo went back to the Dark Ages, probably because she could use plenty of wood there for her experiments or to study the will-o-wisps. We know that her first encounter with Mor’du ended with her turning him into a monstrous bear, but he regresses.
She probably wanted to turn him into a bear because Sully resembles a bear, and she is still trying to figure out where Sully comes from.
Does Boo ever find Sully? I like to think so. He surely reunited with her at least once as a child at the end of Monsters Inc., but eventually, he had to stop visiting.
But her love for Sully is, after all, the crux of the entire Pixar universe. The love of different people of different ages and even different species finding ways to live on Earth without destroying it because of a lust for energy.
And that is the Pixar Theory.
For Inside Out, The Good Dinosaur, and Finding Dory, the story continues in Parts 2,3, and 4 respectively, so here are some other helpful links for your reading pleasure:
- The Pixar Theory – What about Planes?
- The Pixar Detective – an expanded universe novel that explains the theory as a full narrative.
Thanks for reading this. Be sure to say hey on Twitter: @JonNegroni
All images courtesy of Disney/Pixar


Nobody pointed out that the jet turbine didn’t attack the hero? That the idiot flew into it. This one point is enough to hit it home that you’re reaching here. This is what Pixar gets for putting easter eggs in movies.
I like how you accuse people of having no imagination and hating fun if they don’t like your theory. I don’t like your theory because you are making weak conclusions about mundane things. Seems you are far over reaching in many things. Some of the explanations make almost no sense or are so weak they may as well not even be admitted into evidence. Perhaps you should make the theory’s parts more cohesive. Take out the ones that are very weak and make little sense I.E. that a plane attacked a human when it is obvious that this part of the movie is to explain why superheroes pose a threat to every day life. They screw things up. Things such as flying into an airplane engine which could lead to killing hundreds of people.
Oh. Let me add. Why not change the theory. It would be simple really. A timeline loop since everyone likes to do so. Boo goes back to Brave right? Easy connect there.
Like so many clichéd timetravel movies. Syndrom creates energy that is like, what? You guessed it. Magic! Animals and machines and blah blah all the way to Monsters Inc. This technology exsists still. Boo takes technology through the door and gets stuck in the past. She is now in a land where advanced tech would look like magic.
Boo must come back why? Because we have Mr. Tom Hanks movie created by Pixar that shows that everything is going to end. So Boo must go back and try to fix things.
Even this theory is dumb because I know it’s just a bunch of movies with easter eggs that are there to make you laugh when you find them. While it’s fun to sit around and theorize, it’s bad when people begin to take it to seriously and begin lashing out at people that know better.
Okay, you may have a point. We can be a little unstable when someone thinks the Theory’s baloney. But that’s the only thing you’re right about.
First of all, it never says that the plane “attacked” the super. It just says that it’s turbines accidentally caught her cape. And while it’s true it was written to point in the direction of accidentally-on-pupose, Jon was most likely just trying to show that A.I. is beginning it’s war with humans.
(Also, there’s a theory that Edna Mode is responsible for both the girl super and Syndrome’s deaths, so if you really want to blame someone else, blame her.)
Second, Jon was not “making weak conclusions about mundane things.” The Pixar Theory is clever and well though out. Hundreds of people read it and believe it, and for once not just because it’s on the internet. Connecting Boo to the witch in Brave is not based on some random thought such as they look alike. It’s based on the fact that there’s a carving of Sully in her workshop, a carving of the Pizza Plant truck in the same place, and some other evidence that suports it just as well. As for over reaching it–Hell, yeah.
Third, we’re not taking it seriously.
Okay, we may be taking it a little seriously, but what’s wrong with that? Can’t we have some fun with this?
Look, you seem like a nice guy. Make that a good guy. But you’re insulting us. And Jon. The only reason we lash out at people is because they don’t speak very nice. They tell us we’re idiots, and that the Theory is total rubbish. Then we say “F*ck them!” and ask them to get off the site. It’s the Golden Rule. That we bend to the Silver Rule.
So I’m going to ask you to please keep your opinion to yourself, or at least point out the flaws in the Theory with a civil tongue. I hope anyone who thinks the Pixar Theory is false reads this, and keeps a level head. Thank you.
P.s. I apologize if I completely misread something. I’m not thinking too clear!y right now.
Nicely put. Also not complaining but… Mango? T.? Tommy(Bo Man’s land)? Where are you guys? Are we still doing the theory?
I had the idea that I wasn’t included in creating the theory, but now I’m confused. I would love to be involved if you are talking about me, but it’s okay if you weren’t.
I thought I told you. I talked among the group and you ARE in. I thought you knew that. Sorry. T.? Mango? What about you guys? You still in?
I’m totally still in. What are we doing first?
I’m still in, I’ve just been really busy lately.
Cool. Sorry. What should our plan be? Maybe we should communicate through the Google Doc as an idea to keep Jon from having to have all these comment on his site for now?
whayyyyy!!!! rage!!!!!!!!!!!!
i agree especially the weak conclusions part. you say that we don’t really know how bad the pollution is, but actually the the very first thing we see in the opening scene of wall-e is how bad the pollution is, i mean come on there is garbage in space of course its bad
i agree with stony, especially the weak conclusions part. you say that we don’t really know how bad the pollution is, but actually the the very first thing we see in the opening scene of wall-e is how bad the pollution is, i mean come on there is garbage in space of course its bad
Dear Jon Negroni,
I was just reading the MLP comic series “Friends forever #20” and realized that at one point Luna calls Discord by his full name, which is apparently “Discord P. Sullivan”
Assuming the comic series is canon, that would mean Discord and Sully were related, which would mean the MLP universe was part of the Pixar universe, making it part of the Pixar Theory.
What if some of the monsters didn’t agree with using laughter as their energy source, and started searching for other energy sources and came across the use of radiation. Then while testing radiation, they accidentally created a nuclear radiation explosion. Then that radiation killed of most of the monsters, but the creatures that were left eventually became the creatures we see in MLP. Then the few monsters that were left such as Manticores, Draconequuis, Ursa Minor/Major, Cerberus, etc, were banished to Tartarus because the ponies saw them as a threat. But some of the monsters stayed hidden in the Everfree forest, which was the remains of Monstropolis, explaining the real world physics and “dangerous creatures” within the Everfree forest……………………
My brain hurts.
Sincerely,
IluvPixar
Dude…
http://blogs.disney.com/oh-my-disney/2016/03/03/incredibles-set-in-1960s/
They are just now figuring this out? …lol
Have they been living under a rock?
Hello, although I agree with most of this theory there is one thing that just doesn’t add up. If you look closely in Toy Story 2 when Buzz and the other toys go into Al’s Toy Barn to search for Woody, on the right of Buzz there is a section of toys Dim The Beedles. If Toy Story comes before Bug’s Life then why are they in Toy Story? It would mean one of them isn’t in the timeline, I’m guessing.
But the Pizza Planet truck also appears in Bug’s Life so it has to be apart of the timeline. I’m rather confused with this concept, so if someone could refresh me on the matter please?
It could be a fluke. Maybe a bug toy that just happened to look like Dim was made. It’s not like they’d ever seen Dim–even if A Bug’s Life did come after Toy Story 2, humans never see the circus bugs, and why on earth would they make a toy in the likes of him, anyway?
It could also just be a fun reference. A lot of other Bug’s Life-related things appear in the movie, too, and I wouldn’t bother explaining those. It’s best not to dwell on it for too long.
@JonNegroni: Fine and Dandy, but how do you explain this?
Dude, you’re seriously going to ask us to explain something from a kids show about a girl with a magic necklace?
Dear TruthTeller,
I honestly think you have a good point, and would be happy to explain what I have come up.
Perhaps Sofia the first is placed in the part of the Pixar timeline when humans are still prosperous. Taking that into account, what if Sofia is really a descendant of Boo, who created the necklace with the ability to bring certain people back from other times, then handed the necklace down in her family hoping that one of her descendants would be able to find Sully? It’s not too big a stretch when you really think about it. I have actually never seen Sofia the first, and therefor am not aware who or what gave her the necklace, and am basing this solely on what I know about the series.
One last thing. If anyone tells you your dumb for asking this, don’t listen to them. I honestly think any Disney spinoff that includes a Pixar character should be at least considered in The Pixar Theory. I actually think it shows great intelligence to bring up something like that. Thank you.
Sincerely, Watercolor.
Where does inside out fit? It would be cool to see how you incorporate that in this theory.
Never mind. I just read the other parts.
One massive flaw: Boo cannot be both the cause and ultimate effect of the human-animal-machine wars. How is it that the very thing (monsters) that prompts her to travel back and start the whole thing in Brave is ALSO what causes the monsters, the imbalance on the planet to exist in the first place? It does not add up.
FIRST in present earth she is visited by Sully, who already exists in the future.
Searching for Sully CANNOT cause her to go back and set the events of the CREATION of his species into place.
If it were that complex, surely it would affect the timeline every time and massively change the events, as the starting point would then be monsters inc and the ripple effect going BACKWARDS and causing the imbalance. Nice theory, but Boo can’t be the witch
Isn’t this theory based on an ontological paradox? I mean, Boo would have needed to ALREADY have gone back in time for Sully to motivate her to go back in time. Kind of like the movie Interstellar, and where all time travelling theory gets mucked up.
this theory is straight up dumb and shit
If you’re not going to explain WHY you think it’s straight up dumb and shit, then I suggest you take your business elsewhere.
Just would like to point out that the humans in “Monsters, Inc” were not gone or extinct. They even said in the movie…”Kids aren’t scared anymore”, so they weren’t getting enough screams because the kids weren’t scared. That’s where the energy crisis came from, not the extinction of humans.
Well, of course they’d say that. It was Waternoose that remarked it to Sully, and according to the Theory, he was at the top, and the top wanted to keep the other monsters from knowing time travel was involved. So, by saying that to Sully, he kept Sully thinking they were existing in the same time.
Really quick thought, all the Super Hero’s powers were from the wisps and Boo was a Super Hero hence time travel abilities!
(Also justifies scenes when Boo gets away from Sully in ways that don’t seem possible in time frame, like Jack Jack unknowingly using powers)
omg its the best you make everything better
Are you talking to Jon or the teapot?
Our Promises
Hi Jon! i am a big fan and have something interesting to add to the theory concerning the evolution of animals in Finding Nemo. THE SHARKS. they have meetings and try to forget their animal tendencies to eat fish and want to become friends with them!
That comment about the monsters restarting their calender made me think: can’t the 2015 we live in now be the monster’s 2015? The humans eventually all discovered the monster’s use of time travel and started populating the future? And to tie in technology, we could figure out communication between two different time periods. Then people would miss their family or start having 50’s vacations, adding the invention of time cops, thus making multiple messy time lines eventually destroying everything.
I have only 1 question:
– Why did the planmet go from Zero Point Energy back to Fossil Fuels?
In the picture he shows of the trailer in “Bug’s Life”and “Monster’s inc.” you can see a Pizza Planet truck to the left of the trailer. Just Saying.
Emm… I was watching Toy Story. Could Sid’s sister, Hannah, be that she is older Boo? As Jessie appeared in Monsters SA, it could be a wink at this relation.
No. Assuming from the fact Andy kept his wallpaper after moving, wallpapers sign the person of the room. Boo’s room has different wallpaper than Hannah’s thus they are different.
Ok, that’snot true.
But: in A Bug’s Life there’s a shot of a Mega Gulp paper cup from Toy Story. How’s that not rotten?
Also, if the Tree of Magic is planted by Walle, how can it exist BEFORE it got planted?
In Finding Nemo we see a sightly grown “Boo”, aka. Darla.