A few years ago, David Fincher (Fight Club, Seven, Gone Girl) was one of a handful of directors considered for revamping the Spider-man franchise. Of course, Marc Webb was ultimately the final decision, but did you know that Fincher was also considered to launch the franchise back in 1999?
Though Sam Raimi did a brilliant job with at least two movies from that trilogy, a lot of people (like me) believe new blood would be a great start to rebooting Spider-man for the Marvel Cinematic Universe (you know, with the Avengers in the background).
Most of you already know that I despise 2011’s The Amazing Spider-man and moderately enjoyed this past year’s The Amazing Spider-Man 2. That said, I still think a new Spider-man franchise is worth exploring, whether it conserve Andrew Garfield or toss him.
Back to David Fincher. If he was the man behind the camera behind the cowl, we already know some of his vision for telling Peter Parker’s story. Here’s an excerpt from a 2011 interview he did concerning the last Spider-man reboot:
My impression what Spider-Man could be is very different from what Sam [Raimi] did or what Sam wanted to do. I think the reason he directed that movie was because he wanted to do the Marvel comic superhero. I was never interested in the genesis story. I couldn’t get past a guy getting bit by a red and blue spider. It was just a problem… It was not something that I felt I could do straight-faced. I wanted to start with Gwen Stacy and the Green Goblin, and I wanted to kill Gwen Stacy.
The title sequence of the movie that I was going to do was going to be a ten minute — basically a music video, an opera, which was going to be the one shot that took you through the entire Peter Parker [backstory]. Bit by a radio-active spider, the death of Uncle Ben, the loss of Mary Jane, and [then the movie] was going to begin with Peter meeting Gwen Stacy. It was a very different thing, it wasn’t the teenager story. It was much more of the guy who’s settled into being a freak.
Sounds a lot like the beginning of Spider-man 2 (2004) right? Only it would be ten minutes long and resemble more of an opera than comic book pages.
I doubt Fincher will ever be taking on Spider-man anytime soon, though it would be crazy for his first superhero film to be about the webhead. For now, we just have to assume that Marc Webb and Avi Arad still hold all the cards to Spidey’s future.
8 thoughts on “If David Fincher Rebooted ‘Spider-man’”
i’m a huge advocate of this. You have to remember that David Fincher took something like Girl With The Dragon Tattoo and a movie about Mark Zuckerberg and made them both excellent.
If Fincher rebooted Spider-man, he would be legally obligated to do Kraven. I’m no lawyer…but…
Eh, just give it back to Sam Raimi, maybe even bring Tobey back. It could be a continuation of the original trilogy, focusing on Peter Parker ten years after the events of Spider-man 3 (spoilers) which compelled Peter to hang up the cowl and marry MJ. That would perfectly explain why Spider-man was absent during the MCU movies AND would even tie in with the age of Peter Parker during the Civil War comics (he’s a teacher and veteran superhero by this point).
That’s f***** brilliant. Do you have Sony on speed dial?
The whole internet has Sony on speed dial.
I’d love to see Fincher’s Spider-man, but more than that I just like his approach. Spidey needs a movie where he’s not an angsty teen anymore, and I’m just sick to death of his origin story at this point. The next reboot should start with an emotionally mature adult Spider-man, IMHO.